Burliuk

[Игорь Гурьев]

Auction prices mean little to the history of art, Comrade. Syzran.

Is there any Konstantin Makovsky will cost more than, say, Solomatkin although Solomatkin a painter will be better than Konstantin Makovsky.

Just making sure that people like more vulgar pseudo-Russian style, performance mettle, but the fact that these paintings are completely empty and worthless, he can not understand.

As far as Burliuk, his futuristic paintings frankly imitative.
For example, "In the church" - an imitation of Fernand Leger.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

auction prices mean little to the history of art, Comrade.
Syzran.

History of Art I was here less interested in investment in art.
Do not forget the theme of the local site, Comrade.
Guriev.

Added after 7 minutes

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

As far as Burliuk, its futuristic paintings frankly imitative.
For example, "In the church" - an imitation of Fernand Leger.

OK, show that some F. Leger until 1922 (writing Burliuk "The Church") to become clear - a thing Burliuk "The Church" - an imitation of Fernand Leger. "
Here, you know, talking about the pictures, it is desirable to show them, otherwise it's just talk about nothing, comrade. Guriev.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

OK, show that some F. Leger until 1922

Famous painting, look for now I will not, but because the knowledge you have on art history, rather ragged, look for tomorrow.
She was even in Soviet books on modernism reproduced.

Plus there is the influence of Malevich and probably Gleza.

================
Here is a picture in 1919 Leger, the one I mean, I have not found. This is what Comrade. Burliuk and imitated.
I understand, comrade. Syzran that you will find millions of objections, but say at once: I will not accept them: neither analogy nor denials.

Would you like to see, you want - bezplodno argue.

I walk not here to argue, but to express their views and hear the views of others.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Top Burliuk:
Top M. Aladjalova:

Aladzhapov - well, as Burliuk, of course, not, but it Byurlyuk still.
Ie in principle do not necessarily know how that's right draw, it is sufficient demand, but necessary. There are at least things are more important. Temperament, visionary, artistic imagination, conception, in the end. In general, the history remains, what the artist wanted to say, not how he did it. A Burliuk - incorporates the whole of the Russian Futurism, a nominal character of this flow.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[QUOTE="Guriev, Igor; 1368821] I walk not here to argue, but to express ...[/QUOTE]

[I] ... your unsupported arguments, blah blah blah.
[/I]

[size="1"]Added after 2 minutes[/size]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

but since you have knowledge of art history rather ragged, look for tomorrow.

Yes, I do not have any knowledge of art history.

Сообщение от "Guriev, Igor

It was not even in Soviet books on modernism reproduced.

And the Soviet books on modernism, too.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от spigo

I am not a fan of creative Burliuk. And trepeschu the abundance of fans of his painting, but still, as you are working:

Burliuk could switch not only switches Commercial artists, but he had a sense of color that is not all the artists not to mention the other.
Soviet authorities sympathized with all who lived in that etohu, except those who have lost their privileges and was bleeding. This is well written, Ilya Ehrenburg.
Burliuk seen in private collections are very bold and even at the level of Mayakovsky, the great poet. At the same time it's very artistic, beautiful, and is now replaced by inept mishmash of colors.

Posted 3 hours 27 minutes

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

well-known picture, look for now I will not, but because the knowledge you have on art history, rather ragged, look for tomorrow.
She was even in Soviet books on modernism reproduced.

Plus there is the influence of Malevich and probably Gleza.

================
Here is a picture in 1919 Leger, the one I mean, I have not found. This is what Comrade. Burliuk and imitated.
I understand, comrade. Syzran that you will find millions of objections, but say at once: I will not accept them: neither analogy nor denials.

Would you like to see, you want - bezplodno argue.

I walk not here to argue, but to express their views and hear the views of others.

There is a notion of "emulate" and is "testing effect". These are two big differences, as they say, it seems, in Odessa. No major artists who are not experiencing the effects.
Podrazhenie and kompelirovanie is a lot of weak commercial artists.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Pavel

There is a notion of" emulate "and is" testing effect ".

I did not write about it, in my opinion, Burliuk just imitation.
And, say, Matisse was influenced by Picasso.

Effect - is when an independent artist with his own face is influenced by other independent artist.

In my opinion, Burliuk artist not a separate, purely imitative.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

And, say, Matisse was influenced by Picasso.

Remember it is necessary.

As a screw in an intelligent conversation.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от "Cyril Syzransky

Remember it is necessary.

Somehow screw frazochku in intelligent conversation.

I might add.

After the historic meeting of Rubens and Velazquez each tried to write in the style of another.

That is, each has been influenced.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "Guriev, Igor

After the historic meeting of Rubens and Velazquez each tried to write in the style of another.

Too remember.