Single feature ranking

[Ольга Озолина]

Сообщение от Pavel

I did not ask for example, and I'm not your member, and generally you take the money else included in the rating, it means the money can give any rating.

About what must the media for someone to ask, read the above, I already answered.

About the money for recording. This is an old slander, which began simultaneously with the existence of exp.

No money or with whom we never took. If you start taking the money, then "crawl" the entire rating. And then, it seems to me that the material well-being of our founder, Mr. ZAGRAEVSKY no one is beyond doubt, and does not need it to brother-artists with a trembling hand he held out their hard-earned pennies

Normative documents read:
http://rating.artunion.ru/normativ1.htm

The introduction of the artist's unique artistic rating, and any change in its rating category free of charge.

So if anyone in the RC will ask from you money, then go ahead and go to the nearest police station to file a complaint of extortion, bribery

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Olga Ozolina

over the fact whether the media are required for someone to ask, read the above, I already answered.

About the money for recording. This is an old slander, which began simultaneously with the existence of exp.

No money or with whom we never took. If you start taking the money, then "crawl" the entire rating. And then, it seems to me that the material well-being of our founder, Mr. ZAGRAEVSKY no one is beyond doubt, and does not need it to brother-artists with a trembling hand he held out their hard-earned pennies

Normative documents read:
http://rating.artunion.ru/normativ1.htm


So if anyone in the RC will ask from you money, then go ahead and go to the nearest police station to file a complaint of extortion, bribery

I do not wish to participate in your "ranking" and between those present. I protested, but to no avail. I do not know and unwilling to know your ZAGRAEVSKY. You just want to command without any justification. You did not answer on what basis you have the right to make any ratings?
Being in the media is not the reason. This is not a rating migazinov shops, and even there you would quickly shut down the oxygen.

[Ольга Озолина]

Сообщение от Pavel

I do not wish to participate in your "ranking" and between those present. I protested, but to no avail. I do not know and unwilling to know your ZAGRAEVSKY. You just want to command without any justification. You did not answer on what basis you have the right to make any ratings?
Being in the media is not the reason. This is not a rating migazinov shops, and even there you would quickly shut down the oxygen.

Read carefully my post, I'm all the questions they answered.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[QUOTE="Pavel; 1308891] I do not wish to participate in your" ranking "and between those present.
I protested, but to no avail.
[/QUOTE]

I was reminded of an episode from the m /f "38 Parrots" like animals measured the growth of the Boa:

[I][B][COLOR="Navy"]- And a parrot that I am much longer.[/COLOR][/B][/I]

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I was reminded of an episode from the m /f "38 Parrots" like animals measured the growth of the Boa:

- And a parrot that I am much longer.

Here, here.
Parrots and boas.

Added after 3 minutes

Сообщение от Olga Ozolina

Read carefully my post, I'm all the questions they answered.

You did not answer on what grounds and by what right do you assign a category and sets ratings without authorization and without notifying the artist?

I demand to remove my name from your ....

[DSF]

Dear Olga Ozolin, of course, anyone can register and publish any media lists and ratings. All legal. It is understood by all, except Paul.
There is another problem. In trust these ratings. And the credibility of the rating, unfortunately, minimal. First, the flawed approach itself, and secondly, the list of authors is very crude, is crude. You have yet to understand and deal with Russian authors, but you have already threatened to "International rating." Not too early right? I have a feeling that you just reprint the old lists of members of the USSR, reytinguete by age, then it dilutes the available data from auctions. That's all the work. Or am I wrong?

Сообщение от Olga Ozolina

Specifically, please list those in EXP alive, but in real life is dead! It is very important!

No, sorry. You have a commercial project, you are selling information, it is your business. So let's yourself.
A master ZAGRAEVSKY should all still awake from the dream of A and B and to think about selling them as information.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

DSF, these books with ratings of attitude in the market is different.
Who is using this rating, some do not.
But there are so many different time-release EXP.

It's simple: we need you this EXP-buy, no-walk by.

Nobody is forcing the purchase thereof edition.

[Wladzislaw]

On the "west" is, of course, there are ratings.


The most famous that everyone knows and uses - http://www.artfacts.net/index.php/pageType/artists

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Wladzislaw

The "west" is, of course, there are ratings.

The most famous that everyone knows and uses - http://www.artfacts.net/index.php/pageType/artists

This is the ranking of the first hundred and see coca-depth analysis. In addition it is almost identical to the first hundred in Acuna, but there are changes after the sale, ie, sales analysis, and here for a reason. This Bolshany difference, if any, have something to compare.

[Ольга Озолина]

Сообщение от Wladzislaw

The "west" is, of course, there are ratings.

The most famous that everyone knows and uses - http://www.artfacts.net/index.php/pageType/artists

That's the trouble is that, for example, Munk there on the 100m spot after the set is empty, and good artists, but certainly not classics "And this is a wrong approach to auction quotes. After a lot going for them in exchange principle: such as Munch will not go anywhere, and Twombly urgently needs to buy, because it buys Mr. X! And prices are soaring above Twombly not that of Munch and Rembrandt and