How to unleash the artist

[Grigory]

Сообщение от Anaconda

unmoderated forums

???????????????
The fact that we have no duty around the clock, does not mean that the forum is not moderated!

[gans]

Сообщение от Anaconda

I've been about anything, actually - often not been to the museum exhibitions in Europe and noted that the directories there, as such, are absent. Often it is simply a list of the author's works with an Internet link, where you can "refresh" the memory and see how the work looks. Unprofitable to invest in print? How to think, gentlemen? Or is it better the old-fashioned?

So in fact there are simply virtual galleries, and exhibitions that are not being made. Each fact is counting on its capabilities. And catalogs useful thing, as they are, people keep them, pass on to friends, etc. It turns out this long-playing advertising.

[Anaconda]

Сообщение от Grigory

???????????????
The fact that we have no duty around the clock, does not mean that the forum is not moderated!

Well, I know a lot of forums online where a deviation from the topic of punishment)))) And then let the discussion evolve, even if its a new direction, far, far away from a given vector. It was rather a compliment, but did not comment.

Сообщение от gans

A directory useful thing, as they are, people keep them, pass on to friends, etc. It turns out this long-playing ads.

I agree, of course, but it was just me this pattern and was struck. Museum exhibitions invariably accompanied by a catalog (a good seal, articles venerable art), and the usual exhibition satisfied in the best case parustranichnym booklet. So I think - whether in the era of global computerization of the printed catalog for a regular exhibition.

[Sandro]

Сообщение от Anaconda

So I think - whether in the era of global computerization of the printed catalog for a regular exhibition.

Certainly, printed catalog increases as the level of exhibitions and galleries, and the capitalization of the artist. And the fact that they are not often in private galleries, this is a purely financial point. By itself I know what is a long labor and a lot of money - to print more or less decent catalog of the exhibition. For example, we rarely hold exhibitions (times 3 - 4 per year. And then and 2), because I consider it necessary to catalog accompanying a major exhibition.

[Anaconda]

Sandro, thank you very much for the recommendation.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Buscador

Yes, you, my friend, yet expresses himself in French! Apparently all your messages - calked translated from French ...

[color="# 666686"]Added after 14 minutes[/color]

I admire Savrasov. And my compliments to - naturally. Yes, and my love - always natural. As you noticed, Savrasov any fool knows, but I can tell you is well worth it. The fools - they are so clever ... Incidentally, a fool, but critics say that this work Savrasov opened a whole epoch in the history of Russian landscape. Hence the repetition. Copyright repetitive - always had the right to exist. In good authors - they are unique! Look, your favorite Malevich, too nashtampoval black, yes, and reds ... However, there is in each repetition - the greatness of the universe !!!!!!!

Where did you get that I do not like rooks and Savrasova.Ya did not say that. I am sorry that the man he was weak. Repetition is a sign that the artist can not or do not want to go on the difficult path of creativity. You can give the example of Monet who worked in the same path of the landscape and created many masterpieces. We artists sometimes comes out a masterpiece, but before the next run of the average long again ... It knows that someone is constantly working. It worked all the Impressionists, and in general a feature peculiar to the French. A Savrasov by life circumstances showed weakness. That I had in mind.

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Pavel

can be cited the example of Monet who worked in the same path of the landscape and created many masterpieces. We artists sometimes comes out a masterpiece, but before the next run of the average long again ... It knows that someone is constantly working. It worked all the Impressionists, and in general a feature peculiar to the French. A Savrasov by life circumstances showed weakness. That I had in mind.

Well, let Claude Monet worked not only as a landscape ... He preferred to work in plein-air - is yes. I think that he still preferred to plot the picture ... As for the masterpieces, they were not created - they were not before. They worked because they thought it necessary, wrote for Salon because it was necessary ... generally had their own, each with their lives (who are very difficult, who does not). And you never get a speech the same Monet that he allegedly created a masterpiece. Conversely, persistent doubts .... And through them - perfection. But fame and recognition - they are somewhere in nevedamoy gave ... and well, if living, but basically after ...
A masterpiece .... If you have created at least one (and not much happens) - honor and praise.

[Pavel]

Know Monet. Maybe even in French? But what Rooks? Savrasov your favorite. This means he was not Monet masterpieces on this or he had not told anyone? What is a masterpiece you've read? Will tell.
Do you think how much does this work?

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Pavel

Do you know Monet. Maybe even in French? But what Rooks? Savrasov your favorite. This means he was not Monet masterpieces on this or he had not told anyone? What is a masterpiece you've read? Will tell.

After reading this a long time sitting and thinking - how to answer? And I realized that you just need to send (in the sense to send) all of my previous posts. Read carefully and only what is written there.
As for the French, then, unfortunately, failed to achieve the required scale. But, you know, I have enough of the other three languages for full communion.
And my favorite artists, if you are interested, are - Vasily Surikov and Valentin Serov, and OA Renoir and Edgar Degas.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 4 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Pavel

How do you think how much does this work?

Commercialism your interests and radiates outward. Do not you aspire to as "filthy lucre".

[Pavel]

Why do I seek, I know myself. That I read and write to you.
It's good that you like someone else besides Savrasov, but for some reason you do not like that and I like many different artists. You are so watered me and what I see, your avatar strangely reminiscent of Malevich. This is not good, pretending not to be like, should be original. What about still life. What price? You are such a connoisseur.