Fine arts - Study Thaw

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от AlexSpb

today about an article about someone like fraud.

Not "someone" and not quite honest expert witness in their conclusions copy.

I, for one, it's understood.

[Alex_SG]

A question can be , and preferably two , maybe amateurish , but still:
- Why the author copies , made by a transfer grid did not remove all traces of your activity and even with your edits?
- Could at art schools give job as an independent or control of , or as an intermediate which is another example of control make up what is known of the artist?
And yet , as an option even if unlikely , signatures are not there, but there is a handwritten numbering and having samples of signatures or other handwriting samples by the supposed author of handwriting analysis to try to identify. So just a guess , if it's worth it of course.

[Владимир Владимирович]

Grid are self-taught!
Vasiliev great artist.
Repin tore his study when he saw the work of Vasiliev.
Grid and Vasilyev-nonsense.
Look Vasilyeva at the museum!
Maybe something to fuck!

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от AlexSpb; 2485041"

Maybe I just did not see the post from Balagur - he, as I understand it safely eliminated. And, of course, his vocabulary, even in this passage - all these "psychological attack" and "go crazy" - can not be welcome, but that there is criminal, to write about "cognizable case"?

You really did not see. That, however, did not stop you once again give birth ratseey moralizing. At this time - to me.
Meet you - frustrating (and time sorry).
However: "The criminal here" - fraud of some experts that issue (according Balagura) conclusions on obviously false things. Outstanding, guided solely by considerations of conservation of their own mental health. (Balagur wrote - "to not go crazy").
I hope I meet your academic interest?

Сообщение от AlexSpb; 2485041"

I still think that, as a reasonable man, you reconsider your attitude to these situations and give the "reverse", recognizing that a little hot. I am confident that the public respect for you on the forum in this case only be added.

 Why is that, may I ask, is so touching concern for raising my rating on this board? Will add, subtract ...
(Moreover, the "universal respect" - by definition - can neither add nor to subtract. General - it is universal.)

[Артём]

Сообщение от Paulle

simply not interested "categorical judgment," and reasoned arguments, which, of course, and you can agree.

This is unlikely to happen.
Many different copies.
Knowledgeable person immediately sees it.
Here's another copy from the Internet.
You can discuss, but is it necessary?

[Балагур]

Сообщение от Amateur , 2484671

Let doubt. Expert - a person procedurally independent.

Allow me to doubt. Experts with the " psychological attack " is no stranger , experiencing them seven times a day, and have access to such methods of pressure strong immunity.
And here 's what you have written - it definitely jurisdiction. And if you're not ready for the protocol name specific names , addresses , passwords , secret addresses, similar words loudly better not pronounce. For the tag - witty , and an article for fraud has not been canceled .

"If you are not ready for the protocol name specific names , addresses , passwords , turnout"
You when joking, put smiles ...

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от Balagur ; 2485351"

you when you 're joking, put smiles ...

Stop, my friend. Do not force to resort to extreme measures, and share snippets of your personal message (although it is , in my opinion, it would be highly instructive ).
All of the above - serious. So emoticons - alas! - Again not.

[mihailovoh]

- why the author copies , made by a transfer grid did not remove all traces of your activity and even with your edits?
- Could at art schools give job as an independent or control of , or as an intermediate which is another example of control make up what is known artist ?

 Not remote grid in the first place shows no professionalism
 Yes it is common practice for uchenikov.na some works can be found the inscription " copy" and so on. stamps institutions. signature copyist , and is well-known names in the process.
 Not the first topic govoryu.uvazhayte sebya.ved we all ran to ekspertam.Nu unless trust is not who -why begat.chtob mud water at neudoletroryayuschem result.
 >

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2485061"

Not " someone " and not quite honest expert witness in a copy of its findings .

Rather - Mr. joker, ready for the witty, without considering the consequences , blaming God knows what some of these mysterious " experts." While making a surprised face, and seems absolutely sincere wondering : I - what? ( Well, just to live illyustriratsiya nursery rhyme about Lesha and galoshes).
 I remember that specific to enter into particular the experts on this forum discussed a few times . But - specific and specific . But so falsely , for all honest people , for the dubious contribution to the debate ... No , the soul does not accept.

[AlexSpb]

Amateur,

Сообщение от dabbler

I answer you - unpleasant (and time sorry).

- this is a known issue. Of course, much nicer - people like Magnolia the grass on the forum!

You better just before the time spared when accused me of mudslinging some abstract set decent people:

Сообщение от Amateur, 2482781

But you let yourself pakostnichat publicly, deliberately pouring slops many deserving people.

.
Posted better - even for myself alone, but specifically!

Even shake hands are trying to scare me:

Сообщение от Amateur, 2482781

another similar statement - and you risk permanently move into the category of "shake hands".

People tend to shake hands - in real life. It is quite transparent forum, many participants are personally familiar with each other. I, in any case, no one is hiding.
I do not think will be found in the real world of a man who "for the moral and ethical" would stop to talk to me or say hello when they met!

And shake the virtual space - many masters:

Сообщение от Amateur, 2484671

If you are not ready for the protocol name specific names, addresses, passwords, turnout,

Is it possible to ask, that you are with these names, passwords, addresses, yavkami going to do? That's it!

Сообщение от Amateur, 2485301

"universal respect" - by definition - can not add nor subtract. General - it is universal.)

Here I argue hard: I had no education philological and even humanitarian. But from general considerations: like there are different degrees of respect (in contrast, for example, from honesty. Remember the lessons of the French as your favorite old humor: "The Pierre honest parents, Jean more honest, but Paul most honest").
I have not heard that such a rule exists for universal respect. That is, of course, I tend to believe you in this matter, but I do not think that a violation of this rule is a really quite shameful mistake. Even finding was not lazy to type - very often get out quotes like "enjoys more widespread respect" ...
Rather, just as usual, you have decided to replace the matter, thus shifting to deal with on its head.

And by the way, Mr purist native language, if you had taken the trouble even for ten seconds to think about my phrase, to which clung initially, this is our "little discussion" would not arise at all. I wrote:

Сообщение от AlexSpb

Most of the "experts", successfully selling their confirmation

and you read it as "the most" experts "safely torguyusch IT ..." I'm guessing? Grasped the difference?

Сообщение от Amateur, 2485301

Why is that, may I ask, is so touching concern for raising my rating on this forum?

The answer is short and honest: Because you - funny and nice person.

And the last. I think that you think you are more aware of these delicate "okoloekspertiznyh" issues than mere mortal friends, only on the ground that they themselves are experts. If so, then you are deeply mistaken and I'm ready for a detailed clarification of the issue.
I am sure that when you realize they were wrong, ambitions in these topics you diminished and this is only going to benefit you personally as well as around the forum as a whole.