Korovin in the TG

[Peter]

Сообщение от artcol

If russkago art , then there is no such Korovin . Patamushta with the content it is not dense , there is no narrative , only to painting - a smart, skusnaya , but nothing more. IMHO.
.

Therefore, there is a Monet and Pissarro also tops net.Est individual style and a high level of ispolneniya.A Ivanov, Archaeology and the Director is, by Levitan and Savrasov est.Dazhe a Shishkin is (as there is a narrative of his ?) .
Or maybe the question is circulation of reproductions of a work? In PR ? <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[I-V]

Сообщение от Peter; 2046411 '

Maybe the whole question of circulation of reproductions of a work? In PR ?

Do not like it. There's " Poppy Field " by Monet replicated any longer , but still do not say that top . In Monet, you're right, as such, no tops , despite all the " Cathedrals ," " Water Lilies ", etc. And but for Manet, for instance, is tops - "Olympia ", " Zavrak on the grass ," " Bar at the Folies -Bergere ."

Apparently , though, the whole thing in the presence of "content" . But the whole thing is that all of Korovin 's a Russian artist, Russian artist and in should not be alone unto tacos , so that no "content " <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[Peter]

Сообщение от I-V

Apparently, though, the whole thing in the presence of "content".
But the whole thing is that all of Korovin's a Russian artist, Russian artist and in should not be alone unto tacos , so that no "content" <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

Yes, the Russian artist Malevich "Black Square" <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[I-V]

Сообщение от Peter; 2046531 '

Yes, the Russian artist Malevich " Black Square "

Well , he priskhozhdeniyu Russian ( in the sense of Ross. Empire) , but in general, "the world ". A Korovin not escaped from the "Russian" , in my opinion.

Actually, this is an interesting topic . Now it seems to me that a top item appears in the artist when he do not know , he would write after it. That is such a thing , a kind of threshold beyond which the unknown , the point - not a comma. In Grabar , for example , there are several isotopes , despite the fact that he seems to be " empty " impressionist (early Grabar ).

That is tops are original mini- up artist , which summarizes all the technical and spiritual achievements of the previous period . Whether it was from Korovin ? I think not. He did not put "all their wealth " in any one thing, always leaving some in reserve ( the future)

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Peter

Therefore, there is a Monet and Pissarro, too, is not tops.

At top is Monet's series - "Rick", "Lily," "Waterloo Bridge", "Rouen Cathedral".

And it's these seemingly ordinary landscapes include tops and brand:

Добавлено через 2 минуты
And is not that brand?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

And is not that brand?

[I-V]

Сообщение от Kirill Syzran ; 2046631 "

I have a top-end series of Monet - " Rick ", " Lily ," " Waterloo Bridge ", " Rouen Cathedral ".
And it 's these seemingly ordinary landscapes include tops , and brand name :

Сообщение от Kirill Syzran ; 2046651"

Pissarro .

And is not that brand ?

Yes , that's right .. It's all just remember , when talking about Monet and Pissarro . The brand has to be. When they say " Korovin, " particular things does not recall. I at least like that.

[Kaffsky]

Сообщение от IV

I Monet, you're right, such as is not tops, despite all the "Cathedrals," "Water Lilies" and so on ...
 
And but for Man, say, the tops are - "Olympia", "Zavrak on the grass," "Bar at the Folies-Bergere" ...

Claude Monet, Impression, soleil levant, 1872 ...
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->
 
It is not of this top - a masterpiece by Claude Monet originated the term-"Impressionism"?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "Kaffsky; 2046691 '

That is not of this masterpiece of a top-Claude Monet originated the term," Impressionism "?

And as a result, the whole of modernism.
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[I-V]

Сообщение от Kaffsky; 2046691"

Claude Monet, Impression, soleil levant, 1872 ...
 It is not of this masterpiece of a top - Claude Monet originated the term , " Impressionism "?

This is definitely a masterpiece and a milestone in the world of art , yet despite this , no branded item as opposed to those that showed Cyril. Well I think so.

And , incidentally, precisely because it is possible that this thing does not subtotal , so to speak , and vice versa - the beginning. From her " gone" , but it is not " over" a certain stage in the work of Monet (and not he alone, as it turned out ))