Sketch "bring an icon," the XIX-XX

[Eriksson]

Сообщение от redbor

schoolgirl handwriting, penmanship when there was still at school 1950-60 x, and so wrote to the appearance of ballpoint pens.

It is not certain that this girl's handwriting.
Most male.

But, most importantly, discussing who wrote it and why we have gone far from the main issue - whose design it?

[redbor]

Сообщение от Santa

redbor, this is why you surprised ? >
A very common practice , these owners' inscriptions are often found .

Well, obviously , if the painting was owned by Ivan Mikhailovich Kozminykh - Lanin . then he was before the October Revolution.
 A " proprietary word" was made after the revolution, already under Soviet rule.
Why, suddenly ?

[color="#666 686"]Posted 7 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Eriksson; 1767543"

discussing who wrote it and why we have gone far from the main issue - whose design it ?!

Well, if you do not get the style and signature to identify the author's Etudes ,
you can through history to try existence of the picture to find out when and who gave it or sold to the owner, may be exhibited at the show ... and then I'll walk up to the author .

[Santa]

Сообщение от redbor

Why, suddenly?

Heirs, systematized collection.

I think that we should not pay so much attention to this signature.

Better pay attention to the painting itself ..

"Bulk" t.s the world and to solve this

[redbor]

Сообщение от Santa

heirs, systematized collection.

would write: "belonged"

[Артём]

Сообщение от Eriksson; 1767093"

The modern human hands under a calligraphy not sharpened .

Easily any calligraphy.
Do not be fooled that the inscriptions are all made at random , topsy-turvy. Who comes into my head ? Museum staff ? For art lovers ? Or yourself the owner? It is strange and questionable. >
I think that the head zamorochit .
Who is the artist ? Probably no one . Once a week , and even more often skips work by this author.

[Santa]

Сообщение от Artem

Who is the artist?
Probably no one.
Once a week, and even more often skips work by this author.

Artem, but what is it?

Сообщение от intart1

Here, this normal study, which would be nice to return to the author.

Probably a fake would at once dismissed, a professional yet ..

[Артём]

Сообщение от Santa; 1768343"

a pro yet ..

There is no dispute - a super professional.
But the work itself does not cause any emotions. A must ! It so happens that the eye zamylivaetsya , need time to understand, evaluate and feel .
I Daviche J. Lehmann brought.
- Wow! Then thought about the night . No he is not . The work raises other emotions. An objective answer. Sometimes rely on their intuition. And she is not strange, does not fail .

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Artem ; 1768373"

sometimes rely on their intuition. And she is not strange, does not fail .

Now I looked carefully , taking into consideration your point of view , and suddenly opened a sketch by another party.
It's written with pictures, and probably recently .

And my first post , I would not clean up - because it was necessary to start somewhere , no one ventured to say , well, I said .

He looked and said . Impressed by the good peer to seizures I had no sense , expressed first impression, no one to non-binding ...

However , Comrade Tom, you're head .

[intart1]

Yeah. Talk failed. Unfortunately, before he could not take part in it.
1. As for the dating of the sketch late XIX - early XX century. It's not just my personal opinion, but the opinion of experts.
2. On the back is inscribed by the artist: № 14 Nesut icon. Moreover, compliance with the rules of pre-revolutionary orthography.
3. Next inscription in red pencil at the bridge?? Mista Do?? (Do not have figured out why - but it is not signed by the artist and the title of Etudes. Probably for another exhibition.) The remaining litters - or corrupt, or receipt number - this is not so important.
Then - as belonging to Professor Kozminykh Etudes-Lanin. The key word here PROFESSOR. For example, I never could find mention of the professor-Kozminykh Lanin. The scientist-statistics, which works even refers VI Ulyanov-Lenin, some information is there, but what he taught somewhere, and was awarded the title of professor, I never found it. A fuflyzhnik unknown, with a protruding tongue of zeal, redraws the picture, by the authoritative opinion of Mr. Igor Guriev, such information has. Honor and praise to the domestic counterfeiters. And then he, to be more convincing, makes this very proprietary label. It seems like a very thin noticed Ericsson, that our hands are not under such sharpened.
For me it's not a remake. In logic there should be a remake. If we do zadurok and, at least for someone. But here a mystery. Of course, unfortunately this is not a circle Repin, and no anesthesia is understandable, but an artist all the same good. Indeed, the study is similar to the work of many artists of this period. For example, characters, clothing, certain colors are present in the painting of Nathan Altman's "The Fair" (1906) Timing of the meeting. academic catalog. v. 8, p.22. There are a number of artists - VP Bychkov, II Krylov, etc. who have similar work 1890 - 1910's.
And personally for Tivat photo end of this piece of wood (not plywood).
Many thanks to all who participated in the discussion. Learned a lot. Regards.

[Eriksson]

Сообщение от intart1; 1770753"

And, personally for Tivat photo end of this piece of wood ( not plywood) .

Of course , not plywood . Plaque and , judging by the size of a cigar box. A very popular material for sketches from Russian artists of the early twentieth century ( itself recently faced with this , and here in the forum, we discussed is great ).