Glamor in the art

[NATA NOVA]

Originally Posted by Veronic

yes, and Glamour is now modern, or already outdated?

Veronic, as well, may become obsolete that makes money?
And then, "modern" for what? (In what sense?)
Yes ivoobsche, what's the difference?
As Grandpa said, "even though the pot!
What is the difference. Glamour. shark. (About drugs. Prstitutsiyu weapons and will not) Main "Jaguar" (by the way, and "Byugati Verona" is not enough?)
Money is not obsolete NEVER! (And their fans, too!)

[Игорь Гурьев]

Originally Posted by NATA NOVA

Igor Guriev, assuming your promise, that Glamour is an idealization, then the whole socialist realism is the most glamorous "creative method"! (Because of nowhere, perhaps, not so much idealization and varnishing of reality)

I have no "promise", I relayed that thought about Zaryanko in the late 19 th century.
In socialist realism is no glamor nobody ever was, except Laktionova Alexander Ivanovich.
That's a real glamor!
Letter from the front!
Love it!
Hanging on the wall in the kitchen (reproduction, and not one of the seven authors of repetitions, unfortunately).
There was still Sovetskaya glamorous landscape: Boris V. Shcherbakov, for example, Lydia Brotskaya.
So who else glamor in socialist realism?
Well call.
Maya Kuzminichna Ungular, perhaps?

Added after 5 minutes

Originally Posted by dedulya37

You Danilo Fedorova though obzovite pot, but man does what he can. And it may well, in my opinion. He really lives a modern life, and therefore popular in certain circles.
The only difference is that he is without any intelligent thinking about the art of earning enough money to feel free. His mother, for instance, he's birthday gift "Jaguar" (this machine for the uninformed)
So it asks: "...and you could play a nocturne ...", expensive artists?
That the same!

Who is Daniel Fedorov?
____________________
And you know, after all, the IMF also glamurcheg flickers places, but very metered, not going somewhere out there.
Oh, if only you knew how I was raving Stozharau years poppet five or six of my late adolescence and early youth!
Just raving!
And now I love.
A glamurcheg in his paintings barely glimpsed, and for that I love him too.
Because, and this should be in a good picture.
There have not been Surykova glamorous moment - and would be terrible, right?
And Repin, look Ikskul, glamorous flush, so what a thing, eh?
A matissovskaya Glamour since 1918?
Yes, even in the still life that is now exhibited at Sotheby?
(Or, as they say now literate, at Sotheby's).

[dedulya37]

Originally Posted by Guriev, Igor

Who is Daniel Fedorov?

http://mariafedorova.su/?page_id=3

This is a link to my mother and grandfather and grandmother - Vl.Fedorov and Tamara Osipov graduated Surikov in the 50's and is also well-known artists.

Originally Posted by Guriev, Igor

Oh, if only you knew how I was raving Stozharau years poppet five or six of my late adolescence and early youth!
Just raving!

And now I love.

Thank you.
Do you have a book about him, ed. "White City", M.2006?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Originally Posted by dedulya37

Do you have a book about him, ed. "White City", M.2006?

I think I saw her, but I do not remember.

For if not bought, it means all reproductions I already have in other albums.

Although, of course, Stozharau must have all the books.

[dedulya37]

Originally Posted by Guriev, Igor

I think I saw her, but I do not remember.

http://www.labirint.ru/books/116356/

[noart]

Originally Posted by Veronic

Glamour And then what?

Glamour, actually "charm", "charm", "charm")
The founders of the image are considered glamor photographers
Edward Steichen
Horst P. Horst
Brassaï

Patrick Demarchelier
Irving Penn
Herb Ritts
 William Klein
They were the legislators of this style.

Initially, the phenomenon appeared in the society, for the direction, if you like.
And naturally, he had to give a specific name, as well as any phenomenon in the world.
The fact that this notion today vulgarized and dropped down to the lower classes, who used only felt like it, does not mean that the word was coined for the sake of words.
Now the word is used glamor almost anywhere and on any occasion.
The first mention of the word (Glamour) has got into use in this country about 1997 -
GLAMOUR
- The estimated term (estimated at the same time can be either positive or negative depending on the views of the speaker), which means proximity to the generally accepted standards of "luxury", "chic" looks "brilliant". Let's say V. Pelevin "... glamor - is masking, which is necessary in order to raise their social status in the eyes of others. Glamour is needed to ensure that the surrounding thought that a person has access to an infinite source of money ..."

[NATA NOVA]

Originally Posted by dedulya37

http://www.labirint.ru/books/116356/

Granddaddy, "is not available" this book ..

[dedulya37]

Originally Posted by NATA NOVA

Granddaddy," is not available "this book ..

I know where there are many.

[Игорь Гурьев]

dedulya37, yes, I did.
If you have not bought (and I did not buy), so there was not new (for me) pictures.

Added after 6 minutes

Originally Posted by noart

First mention of the word (Glamour) has got into use in this country about 1997

It is not. During the Franco-Russian dictionaries to this was:

Glamour - fascination, attractiveness (the actress).

France has a long magazine Glamour,

[NATA NOVA]

Originally Posted by dedulya37

I know where there are many.

Where the Granddaddy? ("Jaguar" I do not have, but there are "a couple of virtual rubles and lisaped)

Added after 8 minutes

Originally Posted by Guriev, Igor

During the Franco-Russian dictionaries before it:

Once started this binge ....
My Vebster wrote Glamour:
from 1715
"A delightful and often illusory and romantic attractiveness" ... (And another half sheet of different interpretations of the fine print ...)