Petr Konchalovsky GTG

[U_Z]

Сообщение от "Allena

Quote:
Posted by Konstantin
She behaved quite naturally and seemed not to notice their pursuers. Passionate was high art

Ha-ha-ha!

How did it occur. Who is it for opening a blank?
Devushka dressed, dressed, but remeshochek for her watch to buy a little red not think "Well, the classics of the genre for" blondes "- the roots must be identically painted .
The girl, take this with me to her stylist for a low price. I am a good <!--~ 10 ->

Constantine, this is your photo (№ 3 in my post) - SUPER! Masterfully captured! Bravo

[U_Z]

Сообщение от Konstantin

Nu.

It should be noted that the model he came across not so.
Sturdy, if not chubby,

This type was in vogue.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от U_Z

This type was in vogue.

The artist is important form!
And the form ...


Not did he learn the anatomy of protruding ribs and vertebrae model.

[lazycat]

We went with his wife in the evening on opening day. Vpechtlenie painful.

Works on most all known, the same type. And it's not the most talented artist on this show is put on "formulaic". The most pleasant impression made only one still life of 1929 - "Grapes."

Many had the impression that the exhibition, because of the almost 50/50 TG and Andron, arranged to increase the sales of works Konchalovsky at auctions. Because in the last 2 years, these sales are equal to almost zero. <!--~ 10 "->

[Игорь Гурьев]

Konchalovsky - bored?

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от "U_Z

Constantine, is your photo (№ 3 in my post) - SUPER! Masterfully captured! Bravo

A kind word and a cat a pleasure, thank you. In photography, my favorite shot - reporter. He saw the silk - "a masterpiece".

Returning to Konchalovsky:

Many had the impression that the exhibition, because of the almost 50/50 TG and Andron, arranged to increase the sales of works Konchalovsky at auctions. Because in the last 2 years, these sales are equal to almost zero.

90%of the show to do just that and do. It's strange to hear this reproach.

By auctioning the situation is:
During 2009 and 2010 exhibited at various auctions around two dozen works, not too little. At ten in the year. Sold 30-40%of them are not the best result, but it should be noted that all of 30-50 years - not the most interesting for collectors and investment period.
The most amazing show schedule changes in prices. Rare case when prices are rising worse than the middle of the market (first image). And pay attention to the 2010 schedule: average prices for the market went up in Russia, and no Konchalovsky.
The fact that prices go up you could see from another of our schedule ARTIMXba, a schedule of buying activity. The second image black and red is the average world prices.

[Glasha]

Here, as the heroine Irina Muravyova from "Moscow does not believe in tears":
- ... for that there are exhibitions, museums, libraries ...
- What? ..
- Libraries!

Сообщение от U_Z

Who is it for opening a blank?

Indeed. If she had not been a specific task to divert attention from the exhibition itself, then it is still raised. Eclipsed

[lazycat]

Konstantin

This is not a reproach, it is a statement of fact. And a little strange to hear from you, that 90%of exhibitions is arranged to bulge in the work of the artist.

Your graphics only confirm the postulate that the price of Konchalovsky originally were very overheated.

Well, about "all of 30-50 years - not the most interesting for collectors and investment period" - this is not so. The gap in the price of early work and work 30-50 years. - Order. And not everyone can pay 2-3 million for early work, against 100-300 for the thousands of late period.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от lazycat

The gap in the price of early works and works 30-50 years. - Order. And not everyone can pay 2-3 million for early work, against 100-300 for the thousands of late period.

So do not buy the same order Konchalovsky, that the market is there.
One or two sales.

Сообщение от lazycat

Because in the past 2 years, these sales are equal to almost zero.

I would say that sales is not present.

[SergeiSK]

Some critics of "Kommersant":

The legacy of Peter Konchalovsky in Russia and abroad engaged in fund in his name - an interesting organization with links to the top. Sponsored exhibitions in the Russian Museum and Tretyakov advocate parastatals - Gazprom and VTB. By the opening of the exhibition in St. Petersburg Foundation held an international conference with participation of specialists really big on the art of Modernism and Paul Cezanne, whose name it was decided to link the evolution of Konchalovsky. The conference was held in none other, and in the Presidential library. Generally, the fund - is a family history: the founders of it are Nikita Mikhalkov and Andron Konchalovsky, and the director, Alexander Konov, married to the niece of the latter. This cohesive team is keen to name one of the pioneers of Russian avant-garde has received wide distribution. For advanced Muscovites are invited to use the most recent fruits of modernization. Anyone can download an application case for iphone, but for those who have not yet mastered the wisdom of the functional products of Apple, the exhibition has interactive displays, aypady. From a technical point of view and the exposure that way should look like each and every exhibition in the Tretyakov Gallery.
In principle, Konchalovsky - a good candidate for the title of number one avant-garde. He started as a convinced European, corresponded with Picasso, Cezanne studied. Together with colleagues, organized the most important for Russian art association "Jack of Diamonds. The problem is that even in his generation Konchalovsky does not look like the figure of the first plan. is the subtitle of his retrospective cheerful phrase "to the evolution of Russian avant-garde." Although in the case of Peter the Great should speak, on the contrary, the degeneration and progressive process of rejection of avant-garde ideas in favor of the more sluggish the letters form a loose and joyful colors of socialist realism. Konchalovsky - a figure especially tragic, his path from masterpieces to the vagaries can not be called enviable. The deeper Konchalovsky takes root in Soviet life, the worse it became his art. In 1947 he was made an academician of Stalin. Konchalovsky died in 1956, not having lived a few weeks before exposing the cult of personality. And well, perhaps: in the same year because of Khrushchev's report put a bullet in the forehead, Alexander Fadeev, another talent samozaryvshiysya in the routine of the Soviet bureaucracy.
Fund Konchalovsky be grateful to the Tretyakov Gallery. Curator Irina Vakar did everything to save the reputation of a classic. The exhibition at the Russian Museum late Konchalovsky took much more space. In the halls of the Corps of Engineers is hanging only the best. Central part of the exhibition were three family portraits, 1911, 1912 and 1917. Even on them can be seen as yielding hand. From the stern portrait of the first primitive we are transported into protorenessansnuyu statics second. And the third is already written Cezanne flakes, no depth, but still with the idea. Portraits and still lifes of the first half of 1910 all completely gorgeous. The angularity of silhouettes gives them almost sculptural power, though they were molded out of clay. A more traditional portrait of his daughter Natasha in 1915 is ideal for color and the ratio of acute angles and the interior of the human figure. Since the beginning of the revolution Konchalovsky runs Cezanne, with varying success. And then, at the time of intensified struggle between the various art groups for attention of the young government makes its choice. In 1926, Konchalovsky is a member of the Association of Artists of Revolutionary Russia, the famous artists of Revolutionary Russia, association, which formed the aesthetics of socialist realism. Go to the side of servility realists exposed the shortcomings Konchalovsky, painter. Humane Tretyakov this period, almost dropped her. Was responsible for it "girl under the umbrella of" 1929, all articles and articles is inferior accumulated in those years "nu" closest friend - Mashkov. From an equally unsuccessful attempts to try on the role of modern Rubens Moscow audiences too relieved. Is modest in color "Golden Age" in 1949 may hint at how difficult to give an anatomy of avant-garde.
Portrait of a writer Alexei Tolstoy's "Red Count", the specialist for comfort in any political atmosphere, made in the country Konchalovsky. It seems that the artist wrote in disgust that arrogant person this petty gesture of his right hand - which would have to grab off the table? A little grotesque, and we face a caricature Kukryniksy to global capital. But no, it seemed certain: the normal portrait of Stalin's elite high-origin in an era of profound cultural peak.
Valentin Dyakonov
(Kommersant »№ 172 (4472) of 17.09.2010)
This link you can see photos of Kommersant with this exhibition. And all of them present a lady in red! Apparently it was the most interesting exhibit!
http://www.kommersant.ru/dark-galler...5&l=1&stpid=21)