Paintings and prints

[Борис Кон]

Сообщение от kr555

Here the painting from the collection musée Condé

Millésime création /exécution
1699 entre; 1706 et

thanks of course, but I'm on his engraving of her dating !
you were pleased to say that she was not 17 and the early 18th century reprint son

[kr555]

Boris Con, well, read carefully.

"A copy of which Jean-Francois did with the original father"

where does your engraving, talking about the picture.

[Борис Кон]

sorry, I'm not about as they say - who 's a lousy than Ban .

By the way, about the bath !
then I just now banned on one resource , modederator from any there Ekaterinoslavl chtoli. I they put a "Seller sweets ", and
This connoisseur of fine banned me from ignorance , explaining - saying that I cut out pictures from magazines, and then trying to sell them expensive .... ! passing them , as he writes, otbratite attention (! ) for "ANCIENT ENGRAVINGS ! very expression is worth

What about " Constantine" .
Thank you all for participating, for - enlightenment.

[Fed]

Interestingly, some topics have a lively discussion.

Mouse generates an elephant.

Foreign prints, sells for 100 - 200 Euro trigger more discussions than interesting Russian icons like these http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=169871

Mystery.

[Grigory]

Сообщение от Boris Cohn ; 2260131"

by the way, about the bath !
then I just now banned on one resource , modederator from any there Ekaterinoslavl chtoli

And there may be banned (but out of the capital ), for posting pictures "on the side "!!!
This way you show your lack of respect for those who will look at them !
I turn photos tired ... Warning for the future, I will delete those photos ... or ban ...

[redbor]

Сообщение от Boris Cohn ; 2260021"

but I'm on his engraving of her dating !
you were pleased to say that she was not 17 and the early 18th century reprint son

Well, of course : Francois de Troy painted a portrait of comedian (portrait no longer exists) ,
 Cornelis Vermeulen on this portrait in 1694 he built an engraving
 and in the early 18th century the son of Francois de Troy'ya , - Jean Francois wrote a copy of the work of his father, which is not very well received.
 It remains to specify the date of the imprint, which is represented in the subject. So?

[Fed]

Сообщение от redbor; 2260171"

which is not very well-received .

That is amazing. because son drew a better father, and that the price it significantly on the order.

Сообщение от Boris Cohn ; 2260191"

Your prenebrizhenie superfluous and irrelevant comparison

No, just right. The more you like evaluation and attribution. Attribution is not necessary , the assessment is elementary.
In another topic you have been asked , Why? this is necessary.

So I wonder - why not go for a specific subject .

[Артём]

Сообщение от kr555

read closely.

Attentively.
You wrote that:

Well, the author of the original completely different artist.

nothttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_François_de_Troy (1679-1752)

Ahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/François_de_Troy(1645-1730)

And provides a link to Jean_François_de_Troy in post number 10.

I wrote about him.
You do not get confused?

[Борис Кон]

it was much trickier than it seemed

confusion also brought British art dealers.
lyada which was put up son, if there is no father?

[kr555]

Artem, no, not confused, just Boris Cohn did not understand me . And I could not understand it.
In principle , redbor here in this message is all summed up . It is unlikely that we will be able to find out anything beyond that . The only question - what year made ​​impression discussed , and how it differs from a print in the British Museum .