Photography as an object of investment

[Евгений]

Сообщение от KaterinaMN

do not call modern art digital photograph - it is different.
Do not confuse an amateur digital photography for the home album of contemporary art photography and in general - with contemporary photography. that's about as would be - how to discuss investment in dolls, that sell us next to the Savior on Spilled Blood. also an artist, among other things.

Very sensible comment, you are right interesting topic, and began to discuss at the level of "how to paint dolls, a brush, paint, etc."

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Eugene

and began to discuss at the level of "how to paint dolls, a brush, paint, etc."

Indeed, what a topic too painful to vigorously wagged.
I understand that this dynamic turn-merit vigorous party, who loves to write much, but do not read the others.
By the way, and vain. It is possible that I might read it:

Сообщение от KaterinaMN

My name is Catherine Mnatsakanyan, I'm 30 years old, and I completely non-artistic background (ie St. Petersburg State University - economics, law, management). Six years ago I began studying photography. do it a lot. doing it and now (more than 20 exhibitions (almost all - group), membership (fresh) in IFA).

And do not look like with their "comments" so funny in this topic.

[Tamila]

Well, you started a debate.
In fact, the photos a lot of questions and if I may say so "problems" are always born spores. Figure and the film. Documentary and artistic. Report and statement. One should not confuse these concepts.
By the way you can create a separate topic on these issues and to debate in an already pre-designated within

[Grigory]

Сообщение от Tamila

Actually, the photos a lot of questions and if I may say so" problems "are always born spores.

In my opinion, all issues and problems, and not only in photographs, are reduced to the old adage:
Do not have Amati, and learn to CIAPR...

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от Eugene

Very sensible comment, you are right interesting topic, and began to discuss at the level of "how to paint dolls, a brush, paint, etc."

Eugene, on page 10, you and Mr. Tyutchev very happy praised precisely such "dolls". Where had your taste?
What, apart from me no one could tell a real impression? Shy? Or try to be specious all?

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

What, apart from me no one could give a real impression?

 Vladimir, brand camera, film, etc. I do not interesuyut.Vam proposed to start a new topic .. start.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от Eugene

Vladimir, brand camera, film, etc. I do not interesuyut.Vam proposed to start a new topic, start ...

Well why?

Trying to understand the art of the artist-painter, we must learn his technique (in the sense of artistic technique). No wonder many critics whole chapters dedicate to stories about how your finger or a special paint drew particular artist. For example, I have been very useful knowledge that Turner is one of the first switched to white primer for his paintings, but in the end of life began to paint a watercolor on colored paper. All of this technology in the understanding of the painter.

So, trying to understand the works of photographer, you must first understand its equipment, goals, how he is positioning himself. In this sense, the list of photographic equipment for at least a little versed in the subject person has much to say. For example, I well understand the difference between KaterinoyMN and Bagirov. Understanding allows you to speak the same language.

In the end, I stopped looking at KaterinuMN as digital photography. I hope that we had understood each other.

[Евгений]

1.IVAN SHAGIN
The Poor Artist, London, c. late 1940s - early 1950s
Gelatin silver print. 46.4 x 29.8 cm (18 1 /4 x 11 3 /4 in). Signed in ink, titled in pencil, all in Cyrillic on the verso.
ESTIMATE £ 2,000-4,000 Ω
SOLD AT £ 1,500
PROVENANCE Acquired directly from the artist and then by descent; Private Collection, USA
--------------------------------

Читать дальше... 

2. DMITRI BALTERMANTS (Lot 303)
Yuri Gagarin with family, 1961
Gelatin silver print. This work is believed to be printed c. 1960s. 59.7 x 50.5 cm (23 1 /2 x 19 7 /8 in). Signed, titled in Cyrillic in ink and 'Photo by D. Baltermants, Magazine Ogoniok 'stamp on the verso.
ESTIMATE £ 2,000-3,000
SOLD AT £ 6,875
PROVENANCE White Space Gallery, London
-----------------------------------------
3.ALBERTO KORDA (Lot 305)
Fidel Castro shooting pheasant with Kruschev, c. 1960s
Gelatin silver print. 12.1 x 10.8 cm (4 3 /4 x 4 1 /4 in). Titled 'Fidel en la URSS' in ink and Korda studio stamp on the verso.
ESTIMATE £ 700-900
SOLD AT £ 1,375
PROVENANCE Art Beaufort, Hamburg
--------------------------------------------
4.ALEXANDER RODCHENKO (Lot 233)
Mayakovsky with Scottie, 1924
Gelatin silver print. 43.8 x 32.1 cm (17 1 /4 x 12 5 /8 in). Two credit stamps and credit, title, date in an unidentified hand in pencil on the verso.
ESTIMATE £ 18,000-22,000 Ω
SOLD AT £ 15,000
PROVENANCE Rodchenko /Stepanova Archives, Moscow; Howard Schickler Fine Art, New York; Private Collection, USA
LITERATURE A. Lavrentiev, Alexander Rodchenko: Photography, 1924-1954, New Jersey: Knickerbocker Press, 1996, p. 137; G. Shudakov et al., Pioneers of Soviet Photography, London: Thames and Hudson, 1983, p. 217; Revolution in Photography, Moscow: Moscow House of Photography, 2008, p. 42
----------------------------------------
5.MIKHAIL OSHERKOV (Lot 256)
Maxim Gorky, c. 1930
Gelatin silver print. 28.6 x 23.8 cm (11 1 /4 x 9 3 /8 in). Signed in ink, titled and dated 'July, 1934' in Cyrillic in pencil on the verso.

ESTIMATE £ 1,500-2,500 Ω
SOLD AT £ 1,125
PROVENANCE Acquired directly from the artist in the 1990s; Private Collection, USA


http://www.phillipsdepury.com/auctio...ch=&order=&p=1

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

If it was not too much interference of some "helpers" then our discussion would have died out much earlier.

Chernomashentsev Vladimir, if you write about me, then, sorry, but I'm not going to help you. I commented on those of your reasoning, with which I disagree.
 
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showpo...&postcount=129

If you do not want anyone to comment on what you write on the forum, I recommend that you use the "personal message". Believe me, it is very convenient.

[KaterinaMN]

to the question of photography, art and business:

excerpts from interviews with participants and organizers of the debate "Photography: Production-Demonstration-market" which was held April 18 in The New Art Theatre in Moscow.

http://rutube.ru/tracks/3158979.html...bbbe3e82e035d9


and here it is - the last interview with Alexander (San Sanycha) Slyusareva, which filmed Oleg Klimov and Katia Bogachevskaya April 14

http://rutube.ru/tracks/3175920.html...fb8e7245927fa2

----
Unfortunately, I do not know how to insert different - so - give ssylochkami.
(Liberties - are referred to me by Oleg Klimov school Rodchenko)