Photography as an object of investment

[KaterinaMN]

Chernomashentsev Vladimir,
I actually proposed to describe current of our photographers who have completely sold themselves. and not only us.

but, my friends, before we talk about investments in this photo, you must at least agree on terms. what distinguishes those who are not lazy, from those who can collect. who work in this picture for a year, and not two, not five. and not even ten. and thank God - it is itself alive today.

and let's not generalize: if you did not like what I drew attention to an open slip-up about the macro and the fact that each genre has its own camera - do not translate to the fact that we have different interests, and that discussing different things.

at least that is discussed digital photography and how it is discussed - not too shows a deep understanding of contemporary photography and a certain tendency to generalize.

Vladimir, to be honest - you are at all difficult to understand: when it tried to tell them about our contemporary photographers, and how and what they shoot - was the accusation that fond of antiques and not interested in photography. and then, after a couple of posts, you remembered neschatnyh blondes with expensive modern cameras. What you their kamerki something do wrong? "? you scold technique is praise. poor neschatnye blondes. give them rent. should not be confused amateur photography with a photo. forget about technique, when you talk about photography, especially having investpotentsial.

do not call modern art digital photograph - it is different.
Do not confuse an amateur digital photography for home album of contemporary art photography and in general - with contemporary photography. is about the same will be - how to discuss investment in the dolls that sell us next to the Savior on Spilled Blood. Artists, too, among other things.

if you seriously believe that the investment value of the modern picture is not - persuade you senseless.

but please do not call you advanced your photos digitally. it shows a superficial, amateur knowledge of the material. modern picture is not digital. far.
Read what Michael wrote Kalamkarov, Maxim Zheleznyakov, Nadia Sheremetova, Nahl Podolsky, Irina Chmyreva. Look who puts Olga Sviblova, Irina Meglinskaya.
these people - who understand photography. Yes - they have different positions, sometimes they argue. curse. not agree. pass to the individual. But they understand the subject, they talk about. and they - not ashamed to learn.