Photography as an object of investment

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от Eugene

Dear friends, the topic of "investing in photos "....

Absolutely agree with you.
On this subject should not teach or discuss amateur photography work. But the ardor of Internet communication often leads to engage in unnecessary discussions. I'm sorry, I admit it. As soon as I realized the interests KaterinyMN and Bagheera, I realized that we are trying to discuss the different things that irrationally. If it was not too much interference by some "helpers", then our discussion would have died out much earlier.

In conclusion, I repeat that in my opinion, the investment value may be of the same Rodchenko, or just good old pictures of famous masters, the same Emanuel Evzerihina, but not banal modern digital photography. Now a photo-call all the artists who are not lazy. And who has not this money and time. Photo courses can be found on blondes that with aplomb, discussing how the apparatus for 200 or 300 thousand rubles to buy them with money from their husbands. And where then arrange his photo exhibition at dozens ve. Teachers softly leave a residue - after all, their students and sometimes can not understand the principles of photography and shoot mode A "machine" as a banal "soap dish."

You can evaluate the modern photo-design (or as it is properly called?), Say the group AES + F, but not what I saw earlier on this topic. And that so many sugary touted forumisty. Strange tastes ... strange. Particularly striking presentation of some of the good songs.