Art books

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от LCR

Fine material has at least one unquestionable advantage - it allows a detailed acquaintance with the very personable lady in funding this publication - it appears almost all the photographs. Another advantage: there is no doubt about the authenticity of our ladies, but not about the paintings, which she represents, note in passing that the vast majority of these pictures by chance, belongs to our heroine, who, they say, is convinced that publishing them, she provided them with thing is very useful for future commercialization, and we might say, magical - "Provenance".

Truly a wonderful human nature. After the negative, but an intriguing recommendations as much want to buy. And porazgadyvat puzzles with correct and incorrect work

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Acland

It is a pity that on the back cover sheet specifically stated that it is impossible to place on the Internet fragments of this publication. And I would like to put the cover, contents, several unexpected turns and thinly settled turnover kontrtitula - picturesque epigraph, a kind of dedication to those artists whose creativity flourished in the mid XX century.

Is it possible to make an artistic photo? For example the track with a cup of tea on the table and with an open book on the index? Or a cat with a book? And so on ...

[LCR]

[Acland]

[dedulya37]

[kr555]

[dedulya37]

[kr555]

[Алек Сандер]

Сообщение от LCR

One writer, I remember, wondered what exactly summed up his character - "a beautiful force of his talent, or, or complete ignorance of the issue on which he intended to write." There is reason to believe that in our case actually corresponds to second assumption
Fine material has at least one unquestionable advantage - it allows a detailed acquaintance with the very personable lady in funding this publication - it appears almost all the photographs. Another advantage: there is no doubt about the authenticity of our ladies, but not about the paintings, which she represents, note in passing that the vast majority of these pictures by chance, belongs to our heroine, who, they say, is convinced that publishing them, she provided them with thing is very useful for future commercialization and, one might say, even magical - "Provenance".

Bearded anecdotes, recorded from hearsay, arbitrary and unprofessional choice of artists, a selection of paintings, due to the above reasons - nothing else in this book I did not find, therefore, recommend it, there is no way I can.

As regards the first argument will not: I'm still shaky subject carefully avoided in his review, because the author and the history books do not know. I describe only their subjective impressions of the book. It seemed to me empty. A kind of literacy classes, as I wrote.

As for your second claim - namely, the lady who financed the publication (I think it comes a certain T. Flegontova). Here you are, mildly speaking, not true. I honestly looked through the book and looked at every photo, surprised not to have noticed this apparent cult of personality. Subject of your claims, I found three, maybe four or five photos (some photos are too small to reveal the guilt of its narcissism and the degree of its fall). And just a book of photos hundred and more. Why are you telling the truth? This lady you somehow annoy? I personally did not know this lady, but I think if it had financed the publication (a thick doroguschy that at 600 pages), then it could give its full-sized image. It is well deserved, in my opinion.

(Here, just recently Zvereva little album from a distance. "Freedom in captivity. The artist Anatoly Zverev." This is really shameful. Rather, it should be called: "Those pictures Zvereva, that is, in our family, and portraits Zvereva, which capture us, but the fact that our family knows about Zverevo. Polyubopytstvuyte for fun.)

Next. As regards the origin, which the lady gives her pictures ... And that painting, exhibited in any gallery, immediately acquires provenance? I can imagine the collector-buyer: "And what a provenance of this picture?" - "Well!" She's been published in the "Nonconformists"! " - "Wow! Wrap, take!" Well, if as a result of such a buyer acquires falshak, it serves him right, maybe learn something.

Anyway, in his review, I was guided only by one thing: passion for nonconformists. What else like it in recent years? Book with a collection of A. Kronik, where in the book are sample works, but in the end have given the whole collection, but with images in polspichechnogo box? Collection Koreshkova? Of course, all these artists I would like to level three-volume edition Krasnopevtsev. Since then, none did for some reason is not going to meet me! Wong, distance Sitnikova, which I wrote recently, so there is not even bother to insert jokes. Artist? Here, see pictures.

A selection of pictures and I did not quite work for you, and I also reflected, and warned about this. But the plight is always light. And this I also warned all interested.

[LCR]

For the second time in this forum to me suggests that I express disapproval of someone out of personal enmity. It is worth to write about a very poor artist that he - a very bad artist (Gudiashvili) or the horribly unprofessional, stupid and quite shameless book on which the whole of Moscow was laughing with the surroundings, it's a bad book - and here you: I avenging Gudiashvili, for what he told me in the bus stepped on his foot, and Flegontov - it is, say, in turn ahead of me slipped.

I think that 4-5 pictures "of who her supper" in the book, which is not a biography of who paid for the products - this is just for 4-5 photos larger than it should contain.

Now, regarding the origin of works. And you do not know that so they mifotvortsy and work? Only on the publication is necessary for it to work more seriously than in this case.

But it does not matter.

I am a little fed up with excuses, so read Sinel'nikovo, educate, and as for me, I bowed.
Go on without me and all the best.

[Алек Сандер]

Well, why did immediately take offense? You said: "It appears almost all the photographs. I replied: "In three or four of the hundred-odd. I saw an obvious lie and said so. And you immediately in obidki.

You are talking about terribly unprofessional book, over which laughs the whole of Moscow. So tell us the facts! I am also very interested in this because I'm interested in this period. And the other is likely to be interested. I had already spent the money, God with me. But others, thanks to your facts, they will save money. Falshaki published? So tell me what it is. Expose the crooks and scoundrels, to forums and there. You do only thank you. I am first and tell you. I have not and do not accept this book as ultimate truth, but another truth I simply get nowhere. Other publications are not something. And the network of information either. And if the experts are silent and be offended, the truth, we never shall find. Write your own review, with the facts. Recommend replacement. It's all will only be useful. But hurt and slam the door - this is not an option.