How to call a general section on art?

[Art-lover]

Сообщение от sss

) "Territory theories of relativity, probability ... (kidding)
but it seems to me, are not disclosed in the title and the "misty-explanatory subtitle:" to discuss the theoretical, psychological, and so on. aspects of the art ", where the key words are" aspects of art. "

Perhaps it makes sense to uzhatsya: "art studies"?

Of course, it is tempting to call the cat "cat" and not "mustache and Stripes", but we want to be able to talk more about the tiger.)))
But seriously, the advantages of the word "theory" (in the modern sense) before the words with the roots of "maintenance" and "knowledge" already mentioned. It is psychologically gives more space for the staging of controversial issues, and for interdisciplinary discussions (that's already been the topic of physics and lyric, as it is close to the ordinary understanding of art history - and this is just one of many examples). Besides, art is traditionally perceived as parishes art that does not encourage the participation of non-specialists.
Option "territory theories" is balanced with the proposed sub-title: one specifies limits and complements the other. In the context of the forum on the art of "territory theories" could be read as "territory art theories" (the latter was suggested yesterday voloviks and may also take place).

[Marjana]

Сообщение от Art-lover

"territory of art theory" (the latter was suggested yesterday voloviks and also can occur).

I like this name

[Buscador]

Everyone, good day! Absent for two weeks, and then you Exhibitions organized by the Federation Council, create a forum, etc. I vozmozno, have missed something and this proposal has already been, but propose to call - "Kommunalka. After all, there is always resolved all issues, including common ...

[LCR]

Сообщение от Buscador

propose to call - "Kommunalka. After all, there is always resolved all issues, including general ...

It is true, of course, but still would like to avoid the forum form, which sometimes overflowed in a communal address common issues (for details=> a Zoshchenko)

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от LCR

That's true, of course, but still would like to avoid the forum form, which sometimes overflowed in a communal address common issues

Your mallet good. We try again: Beauty and art-closet?. Beauty and art-fund? Round table and art-closet? NekruglyyStol and ...? 12 gurus on the trunk of pictures ... ? Another thought ...

[sss]

Сообщение от Art-lover

... the advantages of the word "theory" (in the modern sense) before the words with the roots of "maintenance" and "knowledge" already mentioned. It is psychologically gives more space for the staging of controversial issues, and for interdisciplinary discussions (that's already been the topic of physics and lyric, as it is close to the ordinary understanding of art history - and this is just one of many examples).

Physics and the lyrics closely in the art, and in the space of art history, which involves interdisciplinary discussion (and theories, among them) - same place))

The word "theory" as any word, too, has its own specific associative array, capable of not only psychologically at ease, but also hamper (from the subjectivity of perception).

I art studies emerged, too, based on the associative (a paraphrase of Natural History , as a set of natural sciences (without separation) of attitudes; well, and as a consequence - a thirst for discovery, research, travel and other romantic pleasures))
in art criticism - all the arts world.

But in the end, I will not argue and I agree even on the territory without theories (communal)), if only section * (* section - is not a verb, a noun ))) proved to be interesting in content.

[LCR]

Or, call our cyber-refuge "theory without territory? In addition, it will sushaya true - we deal with the problem zhiloustroystva skvottiruyuschih orphans, is not it?

Ssschastliva you read, sss, ssstrashno sssoskuchilas!

[Glasha]

Сообщение от sss

The word "theory" as any word, too, has its own specific associative array, capable of not only psychologically at ease, but also hamper (from the subjectivity of perception).

That's right, me - subjective - embarrass some reason .. ))

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]

Сообщение от sss

But in the end, I will not argue and I agree even on the territory without theories (communal)), if only section * (* section - not a verb, a noun))) proved to be interesting content .

In the end, too, do not argue))

[Art-lover]

Сообщение от sss

But in the end, I will not argue and I agree even on the territory without theories (communal)), if only section * (* section - not a verb, a noun))) proved to be interesting content .

OK, just like in this regard to recall (not all have the patience to watch the theme from the beginning) that here we are talking about two different topics - about the area with the theories of (new section) and without (Variation Art -bower)!
Therefore, if the discussion continues, it would be good to clarify reports about what exactly the section in question, but it is an interference.

By the way, another look now, gazebo and came to the conclusion that - in view of simplicity and rapid population density in this section - it would be better to create there a few subsections. My heart will not rest to some one art club or art boxes, because the amount of this very common subheadings very soon exceed the current level throughout the arbor. In order not to return in the near future to this discussion, perhaps it makes sense to immediately provide 2.3 art Bowline subsection?

Сообщение от LCR

Maybe call our cyber-refuge "theory without territory? In addition, it will sushaya true - we deal with the problem zhiloustroystva skvottiruyuschih orphans, is not it?

It's ridiculous plan! But as soon as the territory under the shelter is selected, this name will no longer be justified ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Art-lover

By the way, took another look now, gazebo and came to the conclusion that - in view of simplicity and rapid population density in this section - it would be better to create there a few subsections.

Yes, do so immediately, all Arbor organized by sections and subsections.
I remember-subdivision cleaning (c). : D