Pre-funk, School of San Francisco

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Pavel

Many of expressiveness. Explain about light?

Well, the picture should or shining, like Matisse, or it must be shown the light, carried some svetopostanovka.

Take Caravaggio, Van Gogh, Laktionova - all of them have svetopostanovka, a light source that illuminates the objects, and the light plays on these subjects.

We take, on the other hand, "Zaporozhtsev" Repin: pale gray, uninteresting light, ruining everything.

Why? Of course, it's easier to paint, all in one tone, without harsh shadows.

The same applies to "the First Cavalry," by Alexander Gerasimov.

Of course, another of Picasso art system, there is no bulk items that you can mentally move in space, but the light at the Picasso is conditional, it is almost X-ray some - smooth, cool, etc.

Considering also that a strong colorist, he never was.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Well, the picture should or shining, like Matisse, or it must be shown the light, carried some svetopostanovka.

Take Caravaggio, Van Gogh, Laktionova - all of them have svetopostanovka, a light source that illuminates the objects, and the light plays on these subjects.

We take, on the other hand, "Zaporozhtsev" Repin: pale gray, uninteresting light, ruining everything.

Why? Of course, it's easier to paint, all in one tone, without harsh shadows.

The same applies to "the First Cavalry," by Alexander Gerasimov.

Of course, another of Picasso art system, there is no bulk items that you can mentally move in space, but the light at the Picasso is conditional, it is almost X-ray some - smooth, cool, etc.

Considering also that a strong colorist, he never was.

If all the artists were the same, then the art was not.
I have already said that the light and the lighting is not being. Painting emits light when properly constructed track and take the ratio. This is evident from Matisse and the Americans considered the school and generally doubtful light color in the picture is not installed, and create a composition.
 depending on the problem. When Picasso should he creates, as seen in the portrait Khokhlova and all his works live does not flap, as a recent exhibition at the CHA.
 And Picasso was not the system, he created the system. In general, look at pictures of his own and sostavte their opinion and not the total.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Pavel

When Picasso should he creates, as seen in the portrait Khokhlova

I also thought about her.

But it was there that is just shows that he did not colorist.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

I also thought about it.

But it was there that is just shows that he did not colorist.

What is kollorist?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Pavel

What is kollorist?

This artist or given - or not given.

Teach tsvetovladeniyu impossible.

Picasso was given not so in офигенных pleportsiyah.

[rainyday]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

This is an artist or given - or not given.

can teach tsvetovladeniyu.

Picasso was given not so in офигенных pleportsiyah.

not so --
Never mind that someone given

the artist chooses what and how to use it
always a somewhat limited
here can Mondrianu and was given a sense of tsyveta

We reported this will never know
since he all but three colors refused
voluntarily,
not because he had nothing to buy paint
or he did not know how to mix them together

[Сима]

Сообщение от rainyday

artist chooses what and how to use it
always a somewhat limited

rainyday, is quite correct. Let us not, we blame Poussin with his "trehtsvetkoy" that he did not Watteau, for example.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Sim

rainyday, is quite correct. Let us not, we blame Poussin with his "trehtsvetkoy" that he did not Watteau, for example.

There Poussin was a normal academic palette of earth colors, and still he is fine because he knew how to use tonal relationships.

Added after 53 seconds

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

This is an artist or given - or not given.

Teach tsvetovladeniyu impossible.

Picasso was given not so in офигенных pleportsiyah.

In short, you do not know what it is.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Yes. Dano.

Very moderate.

I mean, before he became abstraktivistom.

did not Picasso and Cubism, he created and a lot of things and everywhere was the discoverer.

[LCR]

The plot of David Park: http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...d=1#post979161

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от rainyday

is not so --
Never mind that someone given

the artist chooses what and how to use it
always a somewhat limited
here can Mondrianu and was given a sense of tsyveta

Yes. Dano.

Very moderate.

I mean, before he became abstraktivistom.