Pre-funk, School of San Francisco

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

And someone opposes?

Is, for example, Matisse contrasted?

Sorry but you have not answered that this lack of sensitivity Picasso?

Posted 6 minutes

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

That laid out by Comrade. LSR in the last message - it is such usredennaya Maslovka 1970: psevdoobobschalovo, featureless swab, no motive.

Generally - zero.

About the color I do not speak.

Drawing - at the same Reshetnikov, that is, no.

Something dreary and graceless type.

Maslovka betrayed in the 70 outstanding paintings. Then were in bloom and in the money all the major until their places have not taken the children. This work is a long time in museums and collections and the latest work LSR is very good, because it is a feeling, but with a sensitivity of the artist is clearly at odds

Added after 9 minutes

Сообщение от LCR

Yeah, it is difficult to imagine that Bischoff asked someone (Dibenkorna, say, or park) pririsoval his dog in the picture, as some heroes Losers Mr. Igor Gur'eva - ->

Actually Reshetnikov had such success with the public, and even now is that we should not ... Elephant is an elephant

Actually, I have long said that oroginalnost is not always an abstraction or concept. It's just a talented work of talented artists and does not depend on the style, and vice versa. There is.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Pavel

Sorry but you have not answered that this lack of sensitivity Picasso?

He had no light in the pictures, you will not notice?

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

It is no light in the pictures, you will not notice?

I repeat, you have not made clear what light perception, which Picasso did not own? Picasso graduated from the academy in 14 years and made academic painting, which was shown at the World Exhibition in Paris. Do not look for what it lacks, and see how all he has many.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от LCR

Yeah, it is difficult to imagine that Bischoff asked someone (Dibenkorna, say, or park) pririsoval his dog in the picture, as some heroes Losers Mr. Igor Gur'eva - ->

What size? Perhaps it is a successful sketch? But the work integral and understandable, all at meste.Horosho.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Pavel

I repeat, you have not made clear what light perception, which Picasso did not own? Picasso graduated from the academy in 14 years and made academic painting, which was shown at the World Exhibition in Paris. Do not look for what it lacks, and see how all he has many.

He really just a lot, but with the light - not so hot.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

It is really just a lot, but with the light - not so hot.

A lot of expressiveness. Explain about the light?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Pavel

Many of expressiveness. Explain about light?

Well, the picture should or shining, like Matisse, or it must be shown the light, carried some svetopostanovka.

Take Caravaggio, Van Gogh, Laktionova - all of them have svetopostanovka, a light source that illuminates the objects, and the light plays on these subjects.

We take, on the other hand, "Zaporozhtsev" Repin: pale gray, uninteresting light, ruining everything.

Why? Of course, it's easier to paint, all in one tone, without harsh shadows.

The same applies to "the First Cavalry," by Alexander Gerasimov.

Of course, another of Picasso art system, there is no bulk items that you can mentally move in space, but the light at the Picasso is conditional, it is almost X-ray some - smooth, cool, etc.

Considering also that a strong colorist, he never was.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Well, the picture should or shining, like Matisse, or it must be shown the light, carried some svetopostanovka.

Take Caravaggio, Van Gogh, Laktionova - all of them have svetopostanovka, a light source that illuminates the objects, and the light plays on these subjects.

We take, on the other hand, "Zaporozhtsev" Repin: pale gray, uninteresting light, ruining everything.

Why? Of course, it's easier to paint, all in one tone, without harsh shadows.

The same applies to "the First Cavalry," by Alexander Gerasimov.

Of course, another of Picasso art system, there is no bulk items that you can mentally move in space, but the light at the Picasso is conditional, it is almost X-ray some - smooth, cool, etc.

Considering also that a strong colorist, he never was.

If all the artists were the same, then the art was not.
I have already said that the light and the lighting is not being. Painting emits light when properly constructed track and take the ratio. This is evident from Matisse and the Americans considered the school and generally doubtful light color in the picture is not installed, and create a composition.
 depending on the problem. When Picasso should he creates, as seen in the portrait Khokhlova and all his works live does not flap, as a recent exhibition at the CHA.
 And Picasso was not the system, he created the system. In general, look at pictures of his own and sostavte their opinion and not the total.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Pavel

When Picasso should he creates, as seen in the portrait Khokhlova

I also thought about her.

But it was there that is just shows that he did not colorist.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

I also thought about it.

But it was there that is just shows that he did not colorist.

What is kollorist?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Pavel

What is kollorist?

This artist or given - or not given.

Teach tsvetovladeniyu impossible.

Picasso was given not so in офигенных pleportsiyah.