Dialog Masters and Art Consulting

[Meister]

I fully agree with Mr y, that before you buy must thoroughly examine the work and not to believe without taking examination. I explain what my claim to art-consulting, pre-make a small digression:

Сообщение от Art Consulting

buy, then that would put someone on the money, this is fraud, and in this case the money you certainly do not get)

You know, we here all decent people and work with the art is clearly not for the sake of someone "put the money."

Now the very explanation: Art Consulting advertises its expertise (especially technology), using a very important argument: The responsibility for their mistake is insured for a certain number of millions. This appears to be a huge advantage, which provide neither the funds nor the expertise of the museum, or the heirs. Finding your way in some works extremely hard, and technological expertise can sometimes provide invaluable assistance. Art Consulting argues that those. examination virtually sinless, that, however, refuted the practice.
Not all have a good knowledge in art and time to obtain them. Insurance liability expert seems to be avoiding some problems. It turns out that Art Consulting is responsible for the fact that it is real or fake money, and my main claim is just that, get the money in which case it is impossible. Let us give another example:
I bought the work of a famous artist 30-ies on the western auction, brought her here, gave those expert in the art-consulting services, as well as on the composite, the question is no. A verdict of Art consulting it false, as was done in 50-ies. If I believe in art consulting, I'd have to take her back to the auction and try to get it. My loss in this case: transportation, insurance, appraisals, but I got rid of the fake stuff. However, I decided that I do not trust art-consulting and drove her to the West recognized worldwide expert on the artist (on the forum earlier cited example of this situation in real life). The expert recognizes the work of this and then my losses look different: round-trip transportation, insurance, examination of the art consulting. And if I had passed the thing on the auction, the "undrawn profit" from a possible resale in the future. And to compensate the losses incurred due to faulty Art consulting impossible, since can not be proved in court. Here I talk about. Let the art-making consulting expertise, it is necessary market, please do not mislead people, that in case of failure thereof, the organization they will be able to recoup their losses. By the way as another example: I bought the work at auction, brought her here, made the examination in art consulting, has concluded that it is real, it povisela at my home 5 years and then I decided to sell it, find that it is a fake. Return to the auction can not, because possibility of a return period is over. Here me back my cost of this work through the courts because of errors Artkonsaltinga would be impossible. Let them do their expertise, but people must understand that this is also IS AT YOUR OWN RISK

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Meister

a verdict of Art consulting it false, as was done in 50-ies

And based on what it is? 1930.1950 very close, pigments which were not in 1930? Or something else?

[Meister]

Сообщение от Eugene

And this is based on what? 1930.1950 very close, pigments which were not in 1930? Or something else?

on the technological expertise ... in the study paints segment, tie ... By the way, now there is technology that allows to determine the pictures that were made before the Second World War. Following the nuclear explosions in the atmosphere of the planet appeared some element that is present all over now, which was not before, respectively.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Meister

on the technological expertise

But to be (unless of course it is possible), about the pigments is not in vain, I asked a question ..

[Meister]

Сообщение от Eugene

And specifically possible (unless of course it is possible), about the pigments is not in vain, I asked the question ..

specifically describe how to carry out technological expertise?

[Евгений]

Meister, Alkyd polymers were invented in 1930, acrylic polymers - in 1935, vinyl - in 1937, these polymers were used initially in the form of solutions in organic solvents, and since 1949 in the form of water dispersions http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=8175
I am very interested in how the experts have determined that the work of 30-ies, was the work of the 50's. (I understand the basis they took pigments? Which was not in 30-s?)

[Meister]

Eugene, it was one of the examples may also be 10 against 35, and 50 to 70, etc.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Meister

this was one of the examples,

I thought that was a specific technological expertise, and it could be discussed ..

[Meister]

Eugene, a very similar situation was an example of qwerty, only the post had to find where art-consulting number 1 was.

[Marina56]

Here's an interesting link http://www.izvestia.ru/investigation/article3122208/
Now up: expert - is nothing more than exchanges of specialists for the money.