What distinguishes the true artist from not present?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

iside, talking about Rembrandt was not, as far as I remember.
In one series with Kulik's difficult to place, that's quite ryadomnestoyaschie phenomena agree.
But Kulik interesting to me, I am interested in everything that makes this artist, I understand a lot, and often strange and interesting. I'm sure. At least the desire to understand, understand.
But Shilov and Safronov dents are not interesting to me, except that the phenomenon of their popularity, although it is clear to me, too, is understandable, but the technology rasskrutki is in place (and where's more, who knows them outside of Russia? - ->) may be helpful. Although ... And everything is clear with these "artists".