Can a fake without a market?

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от gans

Well you are too clever by half . "First, it put me, and not an artist. In general, this work was written many years ago, and in it there is some irony, the artist, for example, put a signature Soutine, which in general are not taken to make copies.

And that is changing nature of the problem, which I put? I wrote:

Сообщение от Tjutchev

If this happens, then in the history of mankind that will not happen in the first nor the last time! This is, of course, only an assumption (for which I apologize to the artist), which should not be inferred that it was Sergei Lykov necessarily take such a proposal, but the assumption would agree, based on historical facts and reality! Here is the very interesting possibility, albeit speculative, such a development ...

This assumption I made in order, to put the following questions. Violate a moral norm of modern (and not only) social artist, who agreed to the proposal to write the work in a creative manner commercially successful colleagues (his contemporary, or long dead)? One of the conditions of such proposal is the observance of all the material - technical reasons, including the presence of a simulated signature of the artist or the absence of a signature at all (the lack of signature is possible to level to its existence) in the absence of any kind have been hints that it is a fake? Who is the artist? Is there something that justifies it in our eyes? Or he's a criminal, without the right to leniency?!

Lykov, with all respect for him, and his copy of Soutine, gave rise to talk that seems to me interesting. No other artist so he agreed to write a fake! Moreover it is not just happening in the history of the art market! The very existence of such a possibility is already reason to talk about it!


P.S. Artist Lykov I wish creative successes and good health! I did not want to offend this man! His work has given only an occasion to reflect ...