Burning Bush

[Деко]

Сообщение от redbor

where in the 19 century "zhivopodobnuyu icon" written all

About zhivopodobnuyu it does not refer. Compare to comparable - the canonical letter to the various branches of Orthodoxy.

Posted by 32 minutes
Quote Natalia Brunet, rather, her article in the magazine "Antiques".
"On the technical side of Suzdal icon represents a much simplified version of the iconography, but they nesomennno had their artistic merit and special expressiveness."
... "I would like to stay on the artistic aspect of the Old Believer icons. As a general rule, there is" masterpieces ", there is no national" entity. "Icons of the 18 th - 20 th centuries show honed professional skills, has experienced the impact of folk traditions" .
It is not against the obvious truth that the Old Believers preserve the canonical letter, which in the 19 th century began to displace the provincial version of academic writing.

[redbor]

Сообщение от Deco

quote Natalia Brunet, rather, her article in the magazine "Antiques".

And who is - Natalia Brunet?
She is right that Old Believer "icon of the 18 th - 20 th centuries showing honed professional skills."
 

Сообщение от Deco

About zhivopodobnuyu it does not refer. Compare to comparable - the canonical letter to the various branches of Orthodoxy.

Deco, and you can to compare the show "nestarobryadcheskie" icons 18-19. cc. canonical letter, of equal skill starobryadcheskim? Probably, no.
18-th century is already fryaz, Baroque and then zhivopodobnaya icon, and then simply akademka lithography