Christie's auction will present a record number of Russian lots

[Кирилл Сызранский]

By the way, something bought:

auctions held last October at Christie `s in London, fell by half - just on the other, which included watercolors. Of the hundreds of sheets of watercolor portraits were purchased by only three or four.
http://www.kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?Do...311&print=true

Added after 3 minutes

Сообщение от Tjutchev

It is curious, who else?

Nicholas Molok , for example, and succeed him as chief editor of "ArtChronika" Milena Orlova .

Added after 8 minutes

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Who can be called truly knowledgeable journalists writing about art and art market?

I called.
You these characters seem to be not "pishushiy knowledgeable about art and art-market"?

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Tatiana Markina, Kommersant.

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Nicholas Molok , for example, and succeed him as chief editor of "ArtChronika" Milena Orlova .

You have identified three name Tatiana Markina, Milena Orlova, Nick Molok. What matters is particularly strong, each of them? What is a ridge of each of these art critics? Which authors of these articles did you find particularly interesting? Publish these materials or give them titles. If you do not remember the name of the article, write about what these texts.

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Tenders were successful than I expected. Sold for good money for first class objects. I thought everything would be worse.

But I do not understand! Graphic sheet in the manner of hierarchy ???!!! Naturally, this work of Bogolyubov irrelevant! It has no relation even to the manner of hierarchy! But bought! And for good money, by the way! I do not blame ... Who knew, explain ...

Lot 296 Manner of Aleksei Bogoliubov
Coming ashore
signed in Cyrillic 'A Bogo .... ov' (lower right)
pencil and watercolour, heightened with white, on paper laid down on paper
8 ¾ x 12 ¾ in. (22.2 x 32.4 cm.)

Price Realized £ 12,500
($ 19,987)

http://www.christies.com/LotFinder/l...8-bc9400a7c2fa

Takoe opisanie raboty ne oznachaet, chto eto rabota Bogoliubova. Auktsion vsio sdelal pravil'no, v sootvetstvii s zakonom, no ih iazyk izlozeniia nado ponimat '.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от AlexanderG

Takoe opisanie raboty ne oznachaet, chto eto rabota Bogoliubova. Auktsion vsio sdelal pravil'no, v sootvetstvii s zakonom, no ih iazyk izlozeniia nado ponimat '.

Thank you, AlexanderG, but I just understand perfectly. I do not understand the other two things. First, why this picture is attributed to «Manner of Aleksei Bogoliubov»?! Nothing to do with Alexei Bogolyubov I do not see! Secondly, I do not understand the price! The picture went for $ 19.987! Agree that $ 20,000 for work in «Manner of Aleksei Bogoliubov», which even can not call itself, it is too! Well, OK $ 1,000 or $ 2,000, but $ 20,000! This somehow does not fit in my head ...

http://www.christies.com/LotFinder/l...8-bc9400a7c2fa

[Синица]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Can not bought?

This is hardly ... In the article cited below says that the Hermitage staff followed the auction and immediately after their contact with the owners of the gallery "Popov".
For watercolor K. Bryullov was a serious bargain at auction, and seemed to be on the site somewhere mentioned that the work sold for a record price for watercolors Bryullov price. If only the Hermitage himself has participated in the bidding, the work could be in the Hermitage.
However, from the article itself and should not be that the work of K. Bryullov came to the Hermitage.

You can look at the results, but unsold, I think, were portraits of Hau.
They are probably more valuable from a historical point of view and it is in the collection. Because almost every job estimate was relatively high for a watercolor artist. A friend from childhood portrait NN Pushkina - still several times more. But all the same - indeed, strange that he is not selling out!
(I myself was thinking - then you can safely select something from what is not sold .)

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Thanks, AlexanderG, but I just understand perfectly. I do not understand the other two things. First, why this picture is attributed to «Manner of Aleksei Bogoliubov»?! Nothing to do with Alexei Bogolyubov I do not see!

Navernoe galerie Popoff podskazal .
A esli auktsion ne nesiot za eto otvetstvennosti, to i. ....

Secondly, I do not understand the price! The picture went for $ 19.987! Agree that $ 20,000 for work in «Manner of Aleksei Bogoliubov», which even can not call itself, it is too! Well, OK $ 1,000 or $ 2,000, but $ 20,000! This somehow does not fit in my head ...

http://www.christies.com/LotFinder/l...8-bc9400a7c2fa

Navernoe kto-to ponadeialsia.
U nas v NZ byl hudoznik C. Goldie, a odin izvestnyi zuk ego poddelyval. Osobenno horosho poluchalas 'podpis'. Stilisticheski - ves'ma otdalionno. On prodal mnozestvo etih kartin i sketchei, a potom popal v tiur'mu. Posle vyhoda on ofitsial'no pomenial imia i familiiu na C. Goldie i prodolzal tu ze deiatel'nost ', no teper' beznakazanno.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Tit

True, the article itself and does not imply that the work of K. Bryullov got to the Hermitage.

And I do not understand.
Tatiana knows for sure, eh?

[Синица]

Well, maybe he knows Tatiana, may not know.
Especially interested, in general, to anything.
We will see later in the promised quick exhibition.

[Allena]

Сообщение от Tit

I do not understand ...
I thought that Karl Briullov bought.

All right , bought, but 2 works - a portrait of Prince Michael A. Obolensky and Prince Oleg at the gates of Constantinople "- remained unsold. Maybe they got to the Hermitage?

[uriart]

Tit, I tried to buy something after the sale.
Let's just say the lower estimate (1000) I offered 700.
I listened on the phone and asked to make a written proposal.
It is clear that my proposal was not accepted, because no response