Design

[Деко]

I think when things are considered landmark in design, art in general - not enough just to see the object. You should know that the author advocates that develops, in which direction to move. In short, without the text in any way.
All eyes were on the square of Malevich and laughed. And when you start to read his theoretical writings, or about him - revealed very different faces. And the square look with different eyes - not as a picture of the child, as well as the creation of genius. And the poetry - always believed since childhood tale of the Golden Cockerel-comb just a fairy tale, but Pushkin - a poet, which is easy to rhyme. A revered - wrote the story under heavy predduelnoy impressions of the situation, thinking about loyalty to the kings of a word (Pushkin personally met with Nicholas and discussed the situation with Gekkernom, with the courting of his wife).
In the 60's sitting on a stool with three nozhkai of plywood and did not know what is the creation of the Finnish genius Alvar Aalto.
I think kitsch from art is distinguished by its essence - kitsch wants just outrageous, the art of looking for ways of development. Although the formal features, they may be similar.

[NATA NOVA]

Originally Posted by Deco

kitsch wants only outrageous, the art of looking for ways of development. Although the formal features, they may be similar.
     

Three-legged stool-it is really an example of genius! (Love it!) Issued Tallinn Plywood and Furniture Works. (Colored 3rub. Apiece)

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Deco

In the 60's sitting on a stool with three nozhkai of plywood and did not know what is the work of the Finnish genius Alvar Aalto.

His findings (cutlery, for example, or a series of vases made of glass) are widely tirozhirovalis the 70-ies.

[fross]

It's funny, because Shipek and architect, one of the last to realize its projects - a luxury house in Prague.
So, for neumeyuschih distinguish kitsch from the design recall the famous aphorism:
Who has no taste, in fact no conscience .

[NATA NOVA]

Originally Posted by fross

It's funny, because Shipek and architect, one of the last to realize its projects - a luxury house in Prague.
So, for neumeyuschih distinguish kitsch from the design recall the famous aphorism:
Who has no taste, in fact no conscience .

Yeah! Kitsch it in Africa kitsch! "Barbecue" is also a lamp "design" miscall .. That's certainly no shame, I agree!

[Деко]

Originally Posted by fross

It's funny, because Shipek and architect, one of the last to realize its projects - a luxury house in Prague.
So, for neumeyuschih distinguish kitsch from the design recall the famous aphorism:
Who has no taste, in fact no conscience .

Ironically, the topic was the subject began with reports that Shipek by architect and interior. What is it - careless reading? Or opening?
If you are in my address at the inability - enabling you to make soybean opinion that you just wanted to make a joke fails. Possible. In terms of fail - yes, a joke - no.

[fross]

Originally Posted by Decaux

Ironically, the topic was the subject began with reports that Shipek by architect and interior. What is it - careless reading? Or opening?
If you are in my address at the inability - enabling you to make soybean opinion that you just wanted to make a joke fails. Possible. In terms of fail - yes, a joke - no.

No, not a joke. That You took this in his address, and quite in vain, and he in whose address was drawn, and who does not recognize the art in design, though respected architects, and anyone in the works Shipeka imagine just kitsch, did you see in themselves are not questioned.

[Деко]

Originally Posted by fross

No, not a joke. That You took this in his address, and quite in vain, and he in whose address was drawn, and who does not recognize the art in design, though respected architects, and anyone in the works Shipeka imagine just kitsch, did you see in themselves are not questioned.

Apologize - considered the messages in chronological order. I've been a brand new man, but I doubt))))
To get away from personal topics to high, and there, and to design not far away, I do not know how the forum refers to the ability Vrubel. Was such an artist. Here the artist was the designer items from pottery, clay, I mean. Not the most elite material. Vrubel so captured the work with clay, that he gave up painting and became a principal artist in Abramtzevo, and then, if not mistaken, in Talashkino.
The forum has already managed to see a thumbnail of Stipa - genius. He works by the artist on the glass. A senior artist at the Leningrad glass factory was Vera Mukhina. Also loved the glass, crying, if something did not work.
Mies Van de Rohe - his Barcelona chair is still considered classics of the genre.
You know - the art is not art - it depends on whether, at what level you climb into his work. When I see modern stadiums, airports, bridges - is it not art. In my opinion, look at the world so that the art - is just fine - to deny himself the pleasure of communicating with other spheres of human creativity.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Deco

Mies Van de Rohe - his Barcelona chair is still considered classics of the genre.

Here: pavilion chair based on designs of mies van der rohe barcelona 1929.

[Деко]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

Here: pavilion chair based on designs of mies van der rohe barcelona 1929.

Yes, you still ask how much it costs from licensed manufacturers. Before the crisis in Kiev is worth, I think, about 20 tysch green.