Продам: Mikhail Vrubel

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

I really like the pattern of the frame itself is symmetrical pattern - the alternation: two "ax" + a "spearhead"
However, the one who made the frame did not take care of the symmetry is not in one of the four sides.

Nobody wrote about the asymmetrical pattern of the ornament. I just pointed out that the ornament was skewed by the assembly of the frame. That is, are facing each other of the frame is not mirrored in each of the four parts are not observed symmetry, which is inherent in the figure of the ornament. So I said the same thing, but in other words ...

Сообщение от yak

For certain frame is old baguette cut which, as now collected in the frame, is the coincidence of the ornament nobody zabotitsya.Na joints was putty which crumbled. My opinion is that when the sticks with a pattern to the cardboard, then and assembled the frame, ie, in the early 20 th century and of course not personally VRUBEL.

When such a scale failure at the joints are very conspicuous and can not be considered a professional decision. Now, yes, and perhaps then things differently, but this did not prove that it is correct.

But all this does not matter ... the tenth frame work ... Who knows whom, and under what circumstances had to make just such a frame. Although the course during the life of an artist of his work was valued ... And as it is difficult to imagine that for Vrubel frame made of scraps ... It is difficult, but nonetheless, it is possible ... The main thing after all the image itself!

Сообщение от yaks, 762,811

... and of course not personally VRUBEL.

Personally VRUBEL? Why do you think that I have a vivid imagination?