Copyright recurrence

[hanzen]

Сообщение от Artem

The artist, like all creative people, comes from the simple to complex and from the complex to the simple life,

I agree with you. The artist as a composer, has a tendency to improvise on his favorite topic. Then the well-known motif gets subtle or objectively new details. The desire to repeat the already written on the canvas may be dictated by the memories of events and feelings associated with this plot.
Once at the Center Grabar's work showed me a snapshot of "Gulf" my great-grandfather Alexis Hansen http://www.hanzen.ru. My shock was dictated by surprise to see this work in Moscow. Such work with some distinctive detail so far are in private collections abroad. It was a beloved grandfather view from a window shop at the family villa.
In his creative rehash of another motive - on "turbulent sea" - I watched three great works. And this is not the only subject that he "perepeval.
  Вложение 146815

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Pavel

All repeats are commercial in nature, do not deceive ourselves. While the artist is cheap if he gets away with it, but at high prices is to first sluchaya.Nikto not want to lose their money. If you still believe that millions of just paying for pretty pictures, you are deeply zabluzhdaetes.Est the notion reputation izdes all very hard.

Paul, you are in the Paris Louvre Museum director say, or London, let them remove Leonardo from museums as malicious konyunkturschika.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от kropotkina-o

5.N.Feshin. An elegant lady in white, Christie, osen2008

Well, that's for sure, NOT Feshin-not his hand! (In the Russian Museum-present)

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Yaya

SergeiSK, I think this whole controversy can be solved only time. moreover, selective approach to the creativity of each individual artist. Claude Monet wrote a few dozen "lily" and they are now priceless

But the owners of repetitions Monet, when they were caught at the exhibition together was very nedovolny.Sam Monet did repeats of commercial considerations.

Added after 3 minutes

Сообщение от Veronic

Paul, you are in the Paris Louvre Museum director say, or London, let them remove Leonardo from museums as malicious konyunkturschika.

Matisse made copies of which are bought for the Ministry of Culture provincial museums. Copies had been one of the types of earnings of artists.

[Veronic]

Paul, there are artists that make the repeats of his paintings, but there is, who do not. And this fact has had virtually no impact on the value of the paintings, as did many artists and it has no effect on anything. Replays were there and will be. In our time, if the buyer does not want the artist once again repeated his work, then you have to pay both for exclusive and supported by an all contracts, so this is done by jewelers and fashion designers.

Replay also will be made by the artist, if the work is not entirely successful from the standpoint of the author and he no longer wants to return to this subject.

A repetition artists of the past no longer destroyed, so will have to accept. Although I do not think that the London Museum laments the fact that the same work of Leonardo is in the Louvre.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Veronic

Paul, there are artists who make duplicates of his paintings, but there is, who do not. And this fact has had virtually no impact on the value of the paintings, as did many artists and it has no effect on anything. Replays were there and will be. In our time, if the buyer does not want the artist once again repeated his work, then you have to pay both for exclusive and supported by an all contracts, so this is done by jewelers and fashion designers.

Replay also will be made by the artist, if the work is not entirely successful from the standpoint of the author and he no longer wants to return to this subject.

A repetition artists of the past no longer destroyed, so will have to accept. Although I do not think that the London Museum laments the fact that the same work of Leonardo is in the Louvre.

Any good artist exclusive precisely because the work is a means of capital investment and it must be expensive as a rarity. With a large number of repetitions is impaired artist
Rembrandt in America more

[Артём]

Сообщение от Pavel

With a large number of repetitions is impaired artist

The other day, one person. Moscow has asked me to redo my work. I told him about how you write, Pavel. At that he said the opposite thing, that if people need it - hence the relevance of this artist and this is fine and offered a price twice.
I say to that view of the artist on art and look businessman completely different. And we are raising them, but we are not each other.

[Art-ort]

Сообщение от Artem

And we are raising them, but we are not each other.

Artist raises self-esteem rather than someone or something to.Lyudi arts (including artists), subsequent generations have a significant role in the posthumous fate of the creative legacy of the author and it is their opinion of those who cherish platyat.Tak that your opinion too grounded.

[Артём]

Сообщение от Art-ort

So your opinion is too grounded.

Where there is me, You're about the posthumous fate, and I'm about life.

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Artem

Where there is me, You're on the posthumous fate, and I'm about life.

This suggests that the issue of dispute. If author repetitions were something criminal, then this would come up with the law.
And so the auction write the author's repeated and all .....