Who are the critics?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Remi

For some articles are relevant?

I am interested in the artist, if his booklet for the exhibition, I see the author of an introductory article for someone from a certain number of names. Go already, still not looking at pictures.

[Remi]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

I am interested in the artist, if his booklet for the exhibition, I see the author of an introductory article for someone from a certain number of names. Go already, still not looking at the pictures.

Okay. In this case, it turns out that there is a "market" art (sounds a bit rude).

[Сима]

The diploma is written: "Qualifications - art historian, art critic."
Ie in the German system, which underlies learning at MSU - these are two different facets of the profession. In my interpretation - art historian - one who had studied in a university course within the art world (chronologically and systematically), and can this "matter" to teach (ie, connected "to articulate on this topic), convey to the listener at least some what about aesthetics, changing styles, masters and masterpieces (and where they are now, these masterpieces, and how to look at reality, rather than reproductions ). The art is - one who can (should be able to) analyze the product (artifact ). And then it all depends on the methodology - an art - a Marxist, the other - Freudian, the third - structuralist. Everybody has their own bird language. They understand, in fact, only "their". + Specialization. One analyzes, "in charge" Rococo, the other - belyutitsev.
And who where "drifted" - is a matter of household. For example, I once skidded to write in the catalog about the artist from the Caribbean. For quite distinct style was an artist, eclectic - a bit surreal, a bit of expressionism. Agreed to 300 cu Wrote, sold in Moscow immediately after the opening day more than a dozen sound tracks, in large houses. They are so bright and merry, marvelous,'s surrealistic, with an ethnic element. Meet, requested a discount, said that he was with my fee discount on a tax will not, ie Tax at my expense. No more writing .

[Pavel]

I believe that the evaluation of the artist in the money should be the time, but subject to the existence of a mechanism allowing to freely buy and sell. In this system, to art collector and classifier place, there is room. If the art works in the museum, he engaged in a narrow topic, and we know what earns.
But from our conversation, I concluded that the art critic sechas sustained no place unless it is an academician. All Somewhere serve and try to move or their relatives or to find a regular abnormal squinting at the vanguard.

[eva777]

Originally Posted by Sima

art historian - one who had studied in a university course within the art world (chronologically and systematically), and can this "matter" to teach (ie, connected "to articulate on this topic), to convey to listeners at least something about the aesthetics, changing styles, masters and masterpieces (and where they are now, these masterpieces, and how to look at reality, rather than in reproduction). The art is - one who can (should be able to) analyze the product (artifact).

Thank you!

[олег назаров]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

I am interested in the artist, if his booklet for the exhibition, I see the author of an introductory article for someone from a certain number of names. Go already, still not looking at the pictures.

 Пожайлуста list a few, (I'm serious, without every kind podkola) really is interesting to know - who would you Cyril identified as authoritative.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Oleg Nazarov

I seriously without every kind podkola

And I realized, and will answer you in l /sec.

[Pavel]

You do not have to lichku. What's the secret here?