Who are the critics?
 

In addition to the market, art dealers, successful artists are invited to consider the role of art in the functioning of the art market.
Not every dealer art.
What is the role played by, and what role should perform the critics?
Press releases for exhibitions are often presented semi-literate journalists.
How to practice running chain: the artist and art-manager-buyer?

The role of art critic vseraskladyvat on shelves quite dispassionately. He must have deep knowledge of art history that the trader not at all, only a measure of curiosity, because the merchant is engaged in narrow specialization, and art to Set the output should represent the entire course of development.

A vy differentsiruete mezdu iskusstvovedom i kritikom?

\r\nIn fact, there are art critics, art historians have-researcher, experts say.\r\nDifferent specialties.

Proizvoditel '(hudoznik) - distribiutor /prodavets (galerei, agenty, auktsiony) - otdel marketinga (pressa, kritika, vo mnogih sluchaiah publichnye muzei /galerei, kuratory) - pokupatel'.

Added after 1 minutes
\r\n\r\nEto imenno to, chto ia imel v vidu. Iskusstvovedu - kuratory.

Let me forgive distinguished art historians, but neither those nor the other experts I have not found on the market of Ukraine ... No in-depth comprehensive study of the work of artists with a complete breakdown by periods of work, materials, paints, primers with which the artist works, etc. No one expert opinions not to be trusted. The lack of basic art criticism base - all floated away somewhere along with the notion of professionalism ... I may be wrong here and correct me. Then I'll know whom to contact in case of need. As art critics, here all is simple - to order and I will write all that is needed. I would like to see a professional analysis of the artist's work with all the calculations ... Critics as well as journalists - working under the customer ... Truth and here "I will not tell you for all of Odessa, all of Odessa is very high ..." It can correct me! (With examples) And in Russia, not so?

Cyril Syzransky,\r\nBut if not an art critic and art historian? Some insist it is for historians, and art history separately. What do you think, Cyril?

But I do think that the word "art" is very common. As a "doctor", for example. For use in the home suit ( "But he who works?" - "Yes, he was a physician."), And for the particular case requires clarification (surgery, traumatology, psychiatrist, venereologist :D).
Man in the topic is clear that a certificate of the concrete period of creativity, Mr. N should apply to such a man, but for the article about the exhibition-to syakomu.
eva777, "art historian"? Not really understand what it is. He makes something?

Istoriia iskusstv, v sovremennom universitetskom tolkovanii, bolee ozabochena stilistikoi i antropologiei, nezeli kakimi-to istoricheskimi faktami i datami.\nNavernoe poetomu termin "Istorik iskusstv" zvuchit stranno.

Good art with pleasure to write about you for 2000 euros. Examples do not bring out the ethical and moral considerations.
But experts there, I know, but only one man, whose conscience and decency, and boundless devotion to not allow you to work "under the customer.