Who are the critics?

[nikolai nesterenko]

Сообщение от Pavel

critics-men of science, and science is the exact thing. They specialize in specific sections, At least to write a dissertation. They must know when ktoto chtoto done so judged on what has been done and the judge about his contemporaries in terms of their knowledge. So it was with the Impressionists and all the avant-garde, but "the vanguard of the 1960's, which is a political rather than artistic performensom, and was just blown art critic. The point here is rather watered orientation than in the art.

You're an artist, what do you you so disparagingly otnostites to your fellow guild? Concerning the "vanguard of the 1960's," which "is a political rather than artistic performensom" good to read the memories of people directly who have launched the art 60's, which you quoted in the vanguard of the call. I can tell you about E. Belutin, founder of the "new reality".
When do you think Khrushchev and his comrades from the ideological Dept. CC was (and) that art historians would agree with you that art is "inflated" the political significance of this artistic phenomenon of the art of "the Sixties"

[Pavel]

Сообщение от nikolai nesterenko

You're an artist, what do you you so disparagingly otnostites to your fellow guild? Concerning the "vanguard of the 1960's," which "is a political rather than artistic performensom" good to read the memories of people directly who have launched the art 60's, which you quoted in the vanguard of the call. I can tell you about E. Belutin, founder of the "new reality".
When do you think Khrushchev and his comrades from the ideological Dept. CC was (and) that art historians would agree with you that art is "inflated" the political significance of this artistic phenomenon of the art of "the Sixties"

Belyutin studio delivered a lot of fun townsfolk feel talentless talent. This is for amateurs. Khrushchev had pereeli baldness. In principle, he made them advertising and quite unfairly, because they are secondary and not to the extent ambitious. Not original they were.

[nikolai nesterenko]

Сообщение от Pavel

Belyutin studio a lot of fun talentless townsfolk feel talent. This is for amateurs. Khrushchev had pereeli baldness. In principle, he made them advertising and quite unfairly, because they are secondary and not to the extent ambitious. Were not original.

you dashingly distributes all the sisters on earrings! Yes, and in the expressions themselves do not consider it possible to contain what is called no comment.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от nikolai nesterenko

how you dashingly distributes all the sisters on earrings! Yes, and in the expressions themselves do not consider it possible to contain what is called no comment.

If I'm wrong-popravte and prove the opposite.

[Remi]

In Yandex to request a "personal artist's website" is issued several million pages. I looked through about 20 sites, nearly every site has an "article" - comments "art", articles from the local press, etc.
If people spend time and effort in placing such information, then they expect something?
If an art - a marketing department, how it should work out their salary?

[Люси]

Сообщение от Pavel

If I'm wrong-popravte and prove the opposite.

Сообщение от Pavel

Belyutin studio a lot of fun talentless townsfolk feel talent. This is for amateurs. Khrushchev had pereeli baldness. In principle, he made them advertising and quite unfairly, because they are secondary and not to the extent ambitious. Were not original.

Paul you are wrong! What can you prove?! Nikolai correctly you recommend ... Literature should be read ... then nothing to prove and no need budet.Eto already klinika.Ya think you have internal steadfast beliefs and prove to you that either will be impossible.

Added after 2 minutes
With all due respect to you.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Lucy

Paul you are wrong! What can you prove?! Nikolai correctly you recommend ... Literature should be read ... then nothing to prove and no need budet.Eto already klinika.Ya think you have internal steadfast beliefs and prove to you that either will be impossible.

Added after 2 minutes
With all due respect to you.

My belief is based on a comparison of empty Belyutin work with this painting. Try it and you will understand everything yourself. No need clinics kakto cheap. To argue so debate. Needless to say ... Try to prove to understand. Do not talk "all think so."

[fross]

Сообщение от Pavel

My belief is based on a comparison of empty Belyutin work with this painting. Try it and you will understand everything yourself. No need clinics kakto cheap. To argue so debate. Needless to say ... Try to prove to understand. Do not talk "all think so".

But if on the basis of your work to make conclusions about the realism of the 90's? Sixties say secondary, borrowing say, well, well
I'd like to read real texts on research work of artists, rather than a set of promotional and other stamps with an endless listing of biographical and statistical data, albeit with a complex vocabulary, unless it is really necessary.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от fross

Well, if on the basis of your work to make conclusions about the realism of the 90's? Sixties say secondary, borrowing say, well, well
I'd like to read real texts on research work of artists, rather than a set of promotional and other stamps with an endless listing of biographical and statistical data, albeit with a complex vocabulary, unless it is really necessary.

So what! Well, draw conclusions and argue.
In art there is a relatively cheap method effects artist to pretend that he knows something, is. Actually loksh. Make then we'll talk. If you can .

[fross]

Сообщение от Pavel

So what! Well, make a conclusion and argue.

In this topic, it can only serve as an example of what will happen to the art if art does not back their right and duty to investigate and evaluate the art.