Who are the critics?

[eva777]

Cyril Syzransky,\r\nBut if not an art critic and art historian? Some insist it is for historians, and art history separately. What do you think, Cyril?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от eva777

But if not an art critic and art historian?

But I do think that the word "art" is very common. As a "doctor", for example. For use in the home suit ( "But he who works?" - "Yes, he was a physician."), And for the particular case requires clarification (surgery, traumatology, psychiatrist, venereologist ).
Man in the topic is clear that a certificate of the concrete period of creativity, Mr. N should apply to such a man, but for the article about the exhibition-to syakomu.
eva777, "art historian"? Not really understand what it is. He makes something?

[AlexanderG]

Istoriia iskusstv, v sovremennom universitetskom tolkovanii, bolee ozabochena stilistikoi i antropologiei, nezeli kakimi-to istoricheskimi faktami i datami.\nNavernoe poetomu termin "Istorik iskusstv" zvuchit stranno.

[eva777]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And I do think that the word "art" is very common. As a "doctor", for example. For use in the home suit ( "But he who works?" - "Yes, he was a physician."), And for the particular case requires clarification (surgery, traumatology, psychiatrist, venereologist ).
Man in the topic is clear that a certificate of the concrete period of creativity, Mr. N should apply to such a man, but for the article about the exhibition-to syakomu.
eva777, "art historian"? Not really understand what it is. He makes something?

That's why, and asked what would understand
But it sounds beautiful!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от eva777

But it sounds beautiful!

\r\nYes, almost as a hero of the World.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And I do think that the word "art" is very common. As a "doctor", for example. For use in the home suit ( "But he who works?" - "Yes, he was a physician."), And for the particular case requires clarification (surgery, traumatology, psychiatrist, venereologist ).
Man in the topic is clear that a certificate of the concrete period of creativity, Mr. N should apply to such a man, but for the article about the exhibition-to syakomu.
eva777, "art historian"? Not really understand what it is. He makes something?

It only seems. Critics-men of science, and science is the exact thing. They specialize in specific sections, At least to write a dissertation. They must know when ktoto chtoto done so judged on what has been done and the judge about his contemporaries in terms of their knowledge. So it was with the Impressionists and all the avant-garde, but "the vanguard of the 1960's, which is a political rather than artistic performensom, and was just blown art critic. The point here is rather watered orientation than in the arts.

[nikolai nesterenko]

Сообщение от Pavel

critics-men of science, and science is the exact thing. They specialize in specific sections, At least to write a dissertation. They must know when ktoto chtoto done so judged on what has been done and the judge about his contemporaries in terms of their knowledge. So it was with the Impressionists and all the avant-garde, but "the vanguard of the 1960's, which is a political rather than artistic performensom, and was just blown art critic. The point here is rather watered orientation than in the art.

You're an artist, what do you you so disparagingly otnostites to your fellow guild? Concerning the "vanguard of the 1960's," which "is a political rather than artistic performensom" good to read the memories of people directly who have launched the art 60's, which you quoted in the vanguard of the call. I can tell you about E. Belutin, founder of the "new reality".
When do you think Khrushchev and his comrades from the ideological Dept. CC was (and) that art historians would agree with you that art is "inflated" the political significance of this artistic phenomenon of the art of "the Sixties"

[Pavel]

Сообщение от nikolai nesterenko

You're an artist, what do you you so disparagingly otnostites to your fellow guild? Concerning the "vanguard of the 1960's," which "is a political rather than artistic performensom" good to read the memories of people directly who have launched the art 60's, which you quoted in the vanguard of the call. I can tell you about E. Belutin, founder of the "new reality".
When do you think Khrushchev and his comrades from the ideological Dept. CC was (and) that art historians would agree with you that art is "inflated" the political significance of this artistic phenomenon of the art of "the Sixties"

Belyutin studio delivered a lot of fun townsfolk feel talentless talent. This is for amateurs. Khrushchev had pereeli baldness. In principle, he made them advertising and quite unfairly, because they are secondary and not to the extent ambitious. Not original they were.

[nikolai nesterenko]

Сообщение от Pavel

Belyutin studio a lot of fun talentless townsfolk feel talent. This is for amateurs. Khrushchev had pereeli baldness. In principle, he made them advertising and quite unfairly, because they are secondary and not to the extent ambitious. Were not original.

you dashingly distributes all the sisters on earrings! Yes, and in the expressions themselves do not consider it possible to contain what is called no comment.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от nikolai nesterenko

how you dashingly distributes all the sisters on earrings! Yes, and in the expressions themselves do not consider it possible to contain what is called no comment.

If I'm wrong-popravte and prove the opposite.