Relationship and mutual obligations between the artist and gallery owners

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от Konstantin

Here are just understandable. If a case is correct and gallery of work and money invested in the promotion of the artist (a hundred times saying how), then to not have a situation-like artist, paintings, too, but I'll go buy directly to the artist because the lowest price. And the gallery is out of work.

As far as I know, the galleries do not do anything for nothing. Choose and reserve a couple of works.
And that means no inheritance? Exhibitions that for nothing? Former Pioneers and the police also handed out candy? A percentage of sales.
  Yes, and ascribe artists as peasants and estates in the 21 st Century - Do you approve?

Сообщение от dedulya37

A contract with the gallery, he showed you?

Even though a familiarity, would not ask pokazat.Esli used only by the artist himself .... And so, and did not mean to ask about the papers do not belong to me.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

Yes, and ascribe artists as peasants and estates in the 21 st Century - Do you approve?

Interesting sight. (Need to think) ..

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

Even though a familiarity, would not ask pokazat.Esli used only by the artist himself .... And so, and did not mean to ask about the papers do not belong to me.

I do not mean that you do not trust the artist.
I was curious what penalties in the contract, because an artist sells a picture on the side. "

[Konstantin]

Yes, and ascribe artists as peasants and estates in the 21 st Century - Do you approve?

That same treaty process, but not violent.
If the artist already venerable and called-(as our Paul for example) and it is all, then yes lock on to any gallery not needed.
And if he can not sell, then come to an agreement with a gallery of some conditions. But conditions may be different, and more importantly are not conditions, but that the result was - the sale.

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от Konstantin

Here are just understandable. If a case is correct and gallery of work and money invested in the promotion of the artist (a hundred times saying how), then to not have a situation-like artist, paintings, too, but I'll go buy directly to the artist because the lowest price. And the gallery is out of work.

Mne, navernoe, povezlo.
Ia ne zapreschaiu hudoznikam prodavat 'iz masterskoi, naoborot, privetstvuiu eto. Dva usloviia: 1. Derzat 'tsenu, 2. Zanosit 'moi protsent. U menia rabotaet.

Odin iz moih printsipov otbora hudoznikov - u nas dolzny byt 'doveritel'nye otnosheniia i zelanie rabotat' vmeste. Poetomu predstavlennyh hudoznikov u menia ochen 'malo, hotia rabotaiu so mnogimi.

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от Konstantin

If an artist already venerable and relevant and should turn to him, let him tied to any gallery not need to.

Sovershenno ne soglasen. Uspeshnym mozet byt 'tol'ko simbioz. Redkie iskliucheniia, lish 'podtverzdaiut pravilo.
Mozet byt 'ne tol'ko galereia, no i agent, predstavitel'.

Naprimer, ia budu v skorosti zakryvat 'svoiu bol'shuiu galereiu, ostavliu malen'kuiu "by appointment only", a bol'shie vystavki budu delat', kak i seichas, v drugih prisposoblennyh pomescheniiah i galereiah. Tem samym ia smogu vysvobodit 'bol'she sredstv (ne platia postoiannnyi rent) i vremeni na konsul'tativnuiu rabotu.

Uze daze nachal perestraivat 'website.

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от dedulya37

I was curious what penalties in the contract, because an artist sells a picture on the side ".

Not kurse.I doubt that some papers there. Why? You know - "nonconformist" be an honor to power, and with dealers .... to obstruct ... and all business.

In general, the relationship of artists and galleries - the theme is not blagodarnaya.Po me so they stand to each other. Here primer.Moemu friend urgently needs some summa.Reshil sell (at a loss because of the urgency) now. Brings into the salon which has recently bought, and said - sell for half of what zaplatil.A those in his answer - there is no free money, and put half the price in the sale can not because our "venerable" will not allow it to sell below its planks.
And then I remembered one beautiful salon in Ruane.Vladelets (and we got to him) in his speech addressed to us after they met, emphasized - ready at any time now to take back and recover all money paid at the time pokupki.Kakovo and !

[Семен Семенович]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

I meet a friend of the artist who often bought from masterskoy.Gotov sell, but .... with one condition - or who do not tell and do not show priobretenie.Prichina - such a condition put a gallery with which he began asking sotrudnichaet.Ne - for life?
Gave the word, bought - as stolen чтоли?.

You know, I think that the whole reason that you want to buy at dumping prices and huzhodnik can not deny or inconvenient. Otherwise, there is no contradiction. I have a contractual relationship with several artists and the condition of our joint work, he can sell out of the shop. but at a specified price. If he sells you, say 10 works at low prices, then 2.3 you leave yourself and the others bring in the same gallery, only to have the price that is lower than the prices of the author (the gallery). And the gallery will sell faster work, which was brought to her from the side. This is an example of a false partnership. That you (not without the participation of the artist) undermines the market price of the author. Unfortunately, faced with such a phenomenon. Those artists who keep the price in the studio, working with a gallery - are in pole position.
If you even persuaded the artist to sell you work cheap (or he gave it to you, as an old friend), then the market it does not infringe. And pryatasya you do not, however like to tell everyone about how much you paid for the work. You hang a picture at home and she'll enjoy and remember the good words of the author.

[Семен Семенович]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

Yes, and ascribe artists as peasants and estates in the 21 st Century - Do you approve?

Only if he is encouraging. After everything is done on a voluntary basis (without the police). Just sometimes, that the artist wants to collaborate with the gallery that she promoted it on the market, looking for contacts ... But when things went well, believes that he himself may be a move. Typically, such "zehery" lead to the fact that the gallery refused to work with him and the artist loses the market. Although, as we have a market has not yet formed and there is "solidarity" - another gallery "selects" hyped hudozhenika. Only under conditions not usually the best. Yes, and will deal with them is unknown. Although, of course. there is an opposite example. I - a decent partnership. Everyone should keep that word. "The fellow said, boy did, even if you virgin "...

[Семен Семенович]

Сообщение от dedulya37

I was curious what penalties in the contract, because an artist sells a picture on the side. "

Even if sanctions were envisaged, not to drag him in the court (and the judges who ?). Gentlemen's agreement - the most common form of work (though the contract I have with all the artists). But avoid "podpolschiny" can not.