|
|||||||
| Art Kaleidoscope Interesting and relevant information about art. Discuss general art issues and any topics not covered in other forums. It’s only about art — love, politics, sports, hobbies etc. are discussed in “Chatter”. |
|
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #9 | |
|
Banned
Регистрация: 25.07.2009
Адрес: Россия, Москва
Сообщений: 875
Спасибо: 1,092
Поблагодарили 1,381 раз(а) в 500 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 12
Репутация: 2191
|
Цитата:
1) The Council correct - must begin with intelligence. 2) Search for the transfer of witnesses on your side. 3) To give his aphorism, which is fully relevant to the legal issues: "The worse the better." As well as the American proverb "The law that was posted. You can not jump, but easily bypassed. Why? I think that to achieve the desired straight path will be very difficult and expensive. And almost impossible for the expiration of limitation period. But opyny lawyer will not waste time and money the client, and try to solve the problem completely on the other hand, even without a trial. How so? Here it is: 4) is an approximate inventory of works at the time of delivery, we find out (with documentary podzhtverzhdeniem), which when sold at auctions and in galleries. 5) and acting on the principle of the great schemer. We take the file with these documents and go to the reception to the director of the museum. Bad if it has a new director, which has no relation to the theft earlier. In private conversation, and explained our suspicions and fears about the loss of pictures. Placed under the painting is perfect, at first glance, a harmless statement to identify the location of the transferred pictures and their current status. Please provide insight into the legacy of his grandfather. Large direct legal benefit of this statement does not really matter, but until we act solely on the nerves. But not necessarily in daddy be legally proven facts - not the court until we go! By law, the museum has a certain period (up to a month) for a written response to the statement on the merits. 6) inform the main thing - their desire to return at least part of the heritage. The fact is that if the museum chaos and paintings are stolen, then just as easily, they can not sell, but "present" pictures, not to develop an unpleasant situation for himself more. 7) museum workers do not understand, I am sure you are completely right and want to "blood"? And ready to act? Getting the prosecution of the museum from all sides. A complaint to the prosecutor's office on the inspection of the content of pictures, a complaint to the police about the fact of theft - it is very tough and relatively hard to move. Although it is possible to do this with absolutely no money and dating. The truth may have to use the complaint to higher authorities - the Interior Ministry and Prosecutor's Office of Russia. It really helps to speed up the good work of the lower structures. 8) Pressure simpler: Rospotrebnadzorr will find a violation in the sale of tickets or booklets, Fire, too, not just the bread is, well, etc. 9) If you thrive in a museum theft, then sooner or later the director considers proper for himself to resolve the issue with you the world. Let completely legal. Summary: this technique can be applied only in a few cases: You sovershennno sure they are right, and the museum is theft. Are you ready to spend their time, perhaps a year or two, the correspondence with the authorities. PS In my personal experience, these simple pre-trial measures allow to solve the problem very easily in 50%of cases. Another 30-40%require a long time. I am thus forced to pay these crooks from the tourist industry (if they are not fools). And most importantly - if your assumptions are wrong, and museum workers are clean, then you risk yourself to be in an awkward legal position. Weigh all is well before the act. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Похожие темы
|
||||
| Тема | Автор | Разделы | Ответов | Последние сообщения |
| There is such an artist PP Leonov | Серж | Artists, artworks, art history | 3 | 09.11.2012 20:07 |
| At Sotheby's has good work | Mark | Art Kaleidoscope | 3 | 04.08.2009 09:58 |
| I have a suspicion that this picture is very old, but still in doubt | Vadim777 | Costs, valuation, attribution | 2 | 28.06.2009 10:38 |
| Have a question | makarena | Costs, valuation, attribution | 8 | 03.06.2009 14:57 |