American Painting

[Семен Семенович]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Semen Semyonych, I understand, this is one arm?

Yes, of course! The first and second Sights written three years ago in Sednief ..
Portraits, unfortunately, will not open (not strong, I do not know why) and they are earlier period

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

I picked up a particularly distinctive (but not quite pornographic, in the literal sense of the word), copies of contemporary Amer. art. On many I mentioned earlier - the way want to look.

Quality is not oh, as photographed from thin. album. Note that these works were printed in the albums with promising titles like "Masterpieces of 20 th century, or are well-respected museum MoMA (The Museum of Modern Art, New-York). In some photos, my semi Panasonic LX-2 refused to focus. This is what happens if you try to remove at a construction site bare gray concrete wall. This thought led me to build a building comments on some of the pictures, the more so that some characters of the forum have already managed to ride roughly over my current method of earnings.

WARNING for connoisseurs of fine nerve Amer. Art:

I do not recommend reading my comments, because they may contain bad words. I ask in this case limited only viewing the pictures, and then my arguments "against" easily turn into arguments for a particular person is.
Restriction of age - no.

Читать дальше... 

1) Vauthier, Art is useless, go home, 1971

I want to start his opus as a joke to me an unknown artist, which explains much of the state of amer culture.

2) Rothko, Magenta, black, green to orange, 1949
3) Rothko, Red on burgundy, 1959

Current classic amer culture, which can now see the original on the Crimean shaft. I agree that in this collection, it looks very fresh and most interesting. I've seen at a construction site beginning painters who were unable to completely paint over the surface. Or did not.

4) Dibenkorn, Ocean Park 115, 1979

In some ways the spiritual successor of Rothko, but very late. Becomes frightening to think that there is somewhere else ocean parks from number 1 to number 114. Repeat before. comment does not consider it necessary, and new can imagine.

5) Marden, grove I, 1973

Paintings Rothko, reaching a peak. It is here that my camera would not focus. Even the technique does not like concrete walls!

6) Klein, Blue Monochrome, 1961

Rothko painting, which reached a peak. And then my camera would not focus.
At the construction site, I would call it a good painter - no neprokrasov, smooth blue surface, as a spray.

7) Ruscha, Uff, 1962-1962

Tired people to work - "a great surface to paint."

8) Prince, Untitled (joke), 1987

Painting Ruscha, which reached a peak. The follower was more stubborn and hard-working - more than words written. So with the Tajiks in the construction site - they all love it and can work.

9) Trokel, Playboy Bunny, 1985, knitted wool

Bound lady hare-picture. It is particularly important to her that it is natural wool. I often argue on the construction site with beginning designers who like to overdo it with textiles, ryusham and pompons. Is this possible to join the most provincial union of artists as "an applied"? I do not want to offend the applied arts - it is in Russia is clearly on a higher level. We do not create masterpieces, associating a typewriter invented by another person logos. This compilation can not even name. This - scarf for an aging playboy or young teenager.

10) Kelly, Colors for a big wall, 1951

Go see at a construction work starts the designer, rather dizaynershi. So often put tiles in children's and women's bathrooms country houses. Ou, who is this artist? Or an artist? I do not think art is when the work is clearly visible gender. Women's art does not exist. Must be just painting.


To be continued ...


PS. For the distinguished Mr. K. Syzran:

You should have ever had anything to say would essentially subject. And it specifically for you and your friends, I printed a warning in bold text. Yes, and my name should already be set for you a warning. Not like me - no problem. Not like me - so do not read. Not grass a soul and does not hold, please, just a place - for this is the message (personal or public).

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

So with the Tajiks in the construction site - they all love it and can work.

Hm ... bad case ...

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

Go see at a construction work starts the designer, rather dizaynershi. So often put tiles in children's and women's bathrooms country houses. Ou, who is this artist? Or an artist? I do not think art is when the work is clearly visible gender. Women's art does not exist. Must be just painting.


To be continued ...

Why such hatred towards women, and in each post, is just cock begins.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Sweetheart Veronic, I do not like only a woman's design, women's poetry and literature and women's art. Because there are no poets, writers and artists.
And I just love women - you can see this on the abundance of portraits of women of my family.

[Маруся]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

Sweet Veronic, I do not like only a woman's design, women's poetry and literature and women's art. Because there are no poets, writers and artists.

Could not resist ... Probably because the woman.
You wrote the other day in one of his essays, not so long ago, grown to the avant-garde.
So let me ask you Exter, Popova, Rozanov, Stepanov, Ermolaeva, Udaltsova and ... that to germofroditam relate or simply prefer not to notice, because they do not fit into your theory. From earlier was still Mary Bashkirtseva ... for example.

Goncharova forgotten.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Forced, forced to go to the replay!

In contrast to the Amer. culture dare to place a similar (but not the same), that did in the early 20 century in Russia. Long before the Americans. So who is responsible to whom? And can it be considered defective repeat masterpiece?

1) Matyushin, movement in space, 1920, fragment
2) Rozanov, Pointless Arrangement, 1916
3) Larionov, Camp, 1910, fragment
4) Boltovich, Fresh Wind, 1916
5) Ender, experience new spatial arrangements, 1920
6) Goncharova, Hoar, 1910-1911, detail
7) Labas, train goes, 1929
8) Kuindzhi, Set, 1900s
9) Malyavin, two girls, 1910e, fragment

I did not choose the floor - I chose the picture. And if there is to remove the name - who determines sexual identity? I just can not! And American women and rushing, behold the whole of their feminism.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Hmm ... worst case ...

   Kirill, your case much more serious! : D
    

Yes! in our iron age fortune-magician
Creates directors of the stupid clerks.
Zlorada, for example, to laughter, the wonder world
With zapyatok a magnificent suffered coach
And, who replaced gold embroidered lace
Introduced and in honor of and to know his wife fondly.
Now he, being proud of harmful laws knowledge,
Plump rip neighbor domain
With its gleaming wheels element
Of mercy mess deserving people. (c)

[Ninni]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

I do not like only a woman's design, women's poetry and literature and women's art. Because there are no poets, writers and artists.

I realized - you prefer the wording: Woman - designer, the woman - a poet, a woman - a writer, a woman - the artist ....

  Or, again, by?

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

In order to obtain:

K. Syzran

You better watch painting. What draws you to where you do not do not want to?

Marusya:

You are a bit mistaken. I wrote that recently reached the stage of abstraction - somewhere 3-5 years ago.
And I'm old enough to avant-garde 25 years ago. I remember how my aunt presented at the 16 anniversary of well-published (for the USSR) album "Painting, born October".
In boring subjects of social realism, there were Juon (new planet), Petrov-Vodkin, Kuprin, Kuznetsov, Schr, Kustodiev (Bolshevik), Rylov, Deineka ... Children's memories - the most powerful.

Tjutchev:

Lyrics are good, but evil. I was offended. They have no place here.


Ninni:

Well it goes-without saying! Uncultured say: a poet or a conductor - so I was taught in childhood.

This professional has no gender - neither male nor female. He already belongs to another world.