American Painting

[Pavel]

Impressionists-etogruppa artists, very talented, who in mid-60g 19c rejected academic rules and appealed to the nature of starting to write from life. In this they used the latest discoveries in physics of color and came to the conclusion that should be written using pure bright color palette and color tone relations. Seen as hooligans and were hated by the academicians, who answered by the same. Gradually, from this environment have highlight the other naprovleniya under the general idea (Sezann. ..). Latest who brilliantly completed this evolution - Great Matisse.
At the academy Giuliana Matisse worked after leaving the Ecole de Bozar, was mocked by classmates and forced to leave. Now I represent what they learned mediocrity.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

It is interesting to me as a novice site, to see a squabble over the so-called American art. A couple of years ago I visited an exhibition in the Pushkin Museum "300 Years of American Art," in making sure once again that in America, this art was not 300 years ago, no, and probably will be gone. 200-300 years ago in America, drawing not the best emigrants from the Old World, as well as talented was not bad at home. And with the advent of the 20 th century Americans used to painting all the principles of advertising and marketing. Design it can be called, but how these products can be called art? This is not art - just the goods, as banks Kempbl soups, Heinz ketchup or Big Mac.
I think that the market entry of high-quality Chinese masters (no, not artists), which perfectly mimic under any purchased item in any area of the world market, the interest in the product, which can be relatively easy for a student to repeat any of the provincial hudgrafa, should decline in 5 -10%of the population. For the rest - and now is not important, what to buy: poster, photograph or original. It is normal for this market, but not art.

Sources: "Andy Warhol - artist of our time." /Almanac Issue. 121, 2005. The State Russian Museum, The Andy Warhol Museum, Palace Editions
Museum of Modern iskusstva.Nyu York. 2005 WORD

I bought these albums, guided by the principle: "the enemy must know in person.
: eek:

Exchange of exhibitions was obviously not advantageous for Russia, if we can speak here of profitability. Compare that went to the New World in exchange for their design ideas:
  "Russia" in New York and Bilbao. 2006 Almanac Issue. 139, State Russian Museum, State Tretyakov Gallery, the Cultural Foundation "Ekaterina", Palace Editions.
For Power pleasant!


Perhaps the most interesting in American painting did not Native Americans, and "fresh" immigrants. See for yourself:
  American artists from Russia Empire. /Almanac Issue. 208, 2008, State Russian Museum, Palace Editions-Graficart

I am pleased to look down, as in 50-70 years, American designers draw squares of different colors, often using cans of paint, not brush. This is their response "slap in the face of Public Taste" of Malevich? Not too late to meet it? As children, who saw something bright and unusual. Ad Reinhardt and Ed Ruscha created their own "masterpieces" in the 1963-1964 year, missed nearly half a century. Richard Prince missed even more, but "developed" creativity "Ruscha. Against this background, even Rothko looks interesting.
Those interested can look at:
Masterpieces of art of the twentieth veka.1997, AST, Phaidon Press Limited

How can you not remember the line Nekrasov:
"... the moan they have a song called ..."

That and the spat at the site revealed - from the American "art" opponents turned to art, focusing on the European Impressionists.

I propose to close the theme of "art" in American, as a ischerpavshuyu.Ili to ascertain the fact that Amer. design is alive and lively of all the living ", and Amer. Art - died before birth.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

It is interesting to me as a novice site

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

I propose to close the theme of "art" in American, as exhausted itself.

Is it too radical? For a beginner?

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Is it too radical? For a beginner?

At most times! Chernomashentsev Vladimir, all perfectly formulated!

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Well, well, we all were once beginners. And my personality is hardly a newcomer to a narrow range widely known site deserves special mention. Alas, my vamiliya not Tretyakov, not Morozov and Shchukin. Not worth paying such a strong attention.
Constitution of Russia guarantees me a lot of rights, which I like to use. Including, and the right to their own opinion. Stress - my own personal opinion. Moreover, my opinion is confirmed by the sources, each of which can see and form their own opinions on this subject.
Do you really think Warhol or E. N. Sofronova great artist?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

I propose to close the theme of "art" in American, as exhausted itself.

 

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

The Constitution of Russia guarantees me a lot of rights, which I like to use.

Yes, and the right to offer "quite close" theme.
It has prevented you? What does "close" in your opinion?
And "exhausted" after she was your message?
All you have to close-voiced, no one can say anything more?
Amba "American art"?

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

Do you really think Warhol or E. N. Sofronova great artist?

     Warhol - a true artist. That's right. But Nikas - is not so. Putting them side by side - like something is wrong. They appear to be on different levels. As for Uorhala do not agree! Strongly disagree!

[Семен Семенович]

Dear Sirs
I present to you the American artist with a Russian school - A. Dverin.
The next year I will present it in his gallery.
Вложение 320935Вложение 320945Вложение 320955Вложение 320965

Вложение 320975Вложение 320985Вложение 320995Вложение 321015Вложение 321005

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Semen Semenovich

Dear Sirs
I present to you the American artist with a Russian school - A. Dverin.

Semen Semyonych, I understand, this is one arm?

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

At least, my provocation completed the theme of the Impressionists in the theme Amer. art. I think I got the correct effect. Exactly my opinions and should understand - only as my personal opinion (even emotional), which absolutely can not be indicating an order or indisputable fact. After someone buys a Warhol painting or to order portraits from N. Safronov. It is not looking at my personal opinion - we have the same freedom as in America has long existed a free market.

It's unpleasant when you quoted, pulling the words out of context, sometimes ironic context: talking about my rights, I explained solely on their own right to express their own opinion. Suppose that a controversial opinion, but personal. I hope that I entertained this as a "novice" and "experienced" with "guru".

Mr. Tjutchev:
I'll try to make a joke that a man with such a well-known Russian name may not like Warhol and other representatives of the Amer. pop art or conceptual art, twisted by unknown elekktrikov, carpenters or mechanics.

  Still, returning to the theme of Amer. Art, humbly beg seasoned tell me, a beginner, the styles of painting that had been born in America, developed in America and at the same time they are serious styles, which can be compared with the effect of impressionazmom or Russian avant-garde. Not considering the little things like hyper-realism.

http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=2355