Art should be explaining?

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от gans

Not quite on topic, but there is still such surveillance. All the "actual" creators and supporters of this trend (Vladimir (a) does not mean I do not know about it), why some advocate the denial of any art other than "actual". I always found it very strange.

A very accurate observation. The situation is the same as in socialist realism, but now the opposite preference. This "Curator" problem, now in hiding will be those who wrote lilac ... plot "Fahrenheit 450".

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от K-Maler

This "Curator" problem, now in hiding will be those who wrote lilac ...

Underground - this is some thing related to the risk of harassment, with the antagonistic relationship or with deep irreconcilable contradictions. And here the question more evolutionary - like the "underground" coachmen proliferated against taxi drivers. Aggression is for "lilac" no no. Of course, better when this lilac hundred years (well, not to her questions), and you feel certain stages and atmosphere of the time. But in this age of the viewer and buyer for the modern "lilac" will suffice. Like - on health. Not Sauro same walls of dwellings to register. Especially if they are "lining" are covered.

PS /By the way, people who rhyme or reason just "lights up" the geometric abstraction cause personally I have even more questions than the authors of "Lilac". This is somehow even more hits on the eyes.

[gans]

Сообщение от Vladimir

Do not Sauro same walls of dwellings to register. Especially if they are "lining" are covered.

That is, if not the lining, then "kontemporari?

[Vladimir]

If no lining, then it kontemporari have a chance. There are people who are in the city "Panels" haunted kitchen wooden batten. Explanation - I want to feel the heat, as in the country, as in the country house. Here they will always be on the walls hang "lilac" and kontemporari - even the spirit of it there is not even close, all the bayonets. And the usual logic: Kabakov with Malevich all lit, millions at auction to pay boobies, Hurst - huckster, and the king - always naked, without the slightest chance to cover his nakedness. I step over it - much harder than developing the logic of negation.

[gans]

Сообщение от Vladimir

If you do not bunk, then it kontemporari have a chance. There are people who are in the city "Panels" haunted kitchen wooden batten. Explanation - I want to feel the heat, as in the country, as in the country house. Here they will always be on the walls hang "lilac" and kontemporari - even the spirit of it there is not even close, all the bayonets. And the usual logic: Kabakov with Malevich all lit, millions at auction to pay boobies, Hurst - huckster, and the king - always naked, without the slightest chance to cover his nakedness.

It's all understandable. But you do not think that when people talk about "traditional" art, trying to draw attention to the quality of the object, but when people talk about "date" is: "You fools do not understand?

For me as a connoisseur including the "actual" art, this position (offended a lack of understanding) is not close.

[Yaya]

gans, and that such quality art object? works of the Impressionists in his time looked supernekachestvennymi (and not only them. Klimt paintings unloved you kicked out of university, for which he wrote them. because it is "vulgar scribble" outraged professors).
I'm not talking about that all objects of art are deteriorating (sooner or later)

[gans]

Сообщение от Yaya

gans, and what is the quality of the art object?

Yaya, you do not see the difference between "quality" and "quality"?
Or do you think that I did not know what to write, and I need to adjust a little bit?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Vladimir

Kabakov with Malevich all lit, millions of auctions pay boobies, Hurst - huckster, and the king - always naked, without the slightest chance to cover his nakedness.

This text can be heard here, do not have the kitchen with bunks and "lilac" go ...

[color="# 666686"]Posted 1 hour 55 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Yaya

but what is the quality of the art object?

Prisoedenyayus to the question.
Zaintnresovalo it-

Сообщение от gans

when they talk about "traditional" art, trying to draw attention to the quality of an object

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 hours 5 minutes[/color]
And by the way, and the stories the guides at the museum, "explained art"?
I wonder what they're told? Heard recently a few snatches of phrases are interested in the pronunciation guide and "Exeter" with the accent on the first syllable. Remember ...

[Yaya]

gans, not seen. I decided that this common typo. what are you now a warrior?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от gans

Or do you think that I did not know what to write, and I need to adjust a little bit?

Here's my "correct", or rather point to the grammatical errors, which are often lapse inadvertently.
But how comforting to know that you read carefully, "with feeling, with properly, with deliberation! : D: D: D