19.07.2009, 13:01
|
Язык оригинала: Русский
#11
|
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 13.02.2009
Сообщений: 7,384
Спасибо: 3,976
Поблагодарили 4,028 раз(а) в 1,687 сообщениях
Репутация: -2
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от Semen Semenovich
And yet we speak with you about several different things. Summing up the sales of (semi-annual and annual) are doing the analysis: how much to sell stock of a particular artist, who buys, what, where to go work, what is needed in certain subjects, etc. This work gallery. It is, so to speak, is a little cabin in nature and are calculated on the promotion of artists and their vision ... Auction also exhibited, as a rule, "top" artists, a little stirring their promotion of a little-known or contemporary collections of personal collections (if you gathered enough). And here is an attempt to "make money" (not the artist) today and now ... So I think
|
Such an attitude to shareholders associated with distrust nim.Kazhetsya that the success of an artist must be guaranteed and there complete anarchy, but it only seems. Auction Duo - independent of galleries (I quote an example of what I know). They sell everything and give the impression of independence, but in fact there are people in the halls from which everything depends. This gallery owners. They raise and lower the price. When you set the price - when the thing is selling multiple-going rise in the price-all the things that artists appear tutzhe appear in galleries, where prices are higher so much dictated by raising auction. The task gallery owners to find an artist who can raise the price even further by repeated sales of its rising prices by creating a demand that is not all gallery owners sell the work once, but as far as raising the demand. Since approximately.
|
|
|