"Theft, forgery" as a separate section of the forum

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от v_r

You still say that all the information about the origin of the paintings are best build in the militia.

I'm not talking about the theft as an event, but an indictment of someone in the commission.
If you want to steal - stolen. And not what locks are not pomogut.Osobenno if "put an eye" state. Unscrupulous heirs artists also did not graze the rear. In any case, the presence of a receipt, check on purchase or any other document certifying the right to own, today neobhodimo.No that is another topic.

[v_r]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

I'm not talking about the theft as an event, but an indictment of someone in the commission.

Here, nobody do not blame anyone.

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

If you want to steal - steal

Who will buy? Buying stolen goods could seriously spoil the reputation.

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

Especially if the "eye put" the state.

In such cases, the more impossible to remain silent. We can not allow the State to get involved in expropriation.

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

Unscrupulous heirs artists also did not graze the rear.

I find it difficult to talk about unscrupulous heirs. I know very little.
On behalf of all the heirs of artists can not speak. I can only say about myself. Fakes do not know how. Donated, sold or even stolen (with the exception of one "Portrait of the daughter, ie me) do not ask to return. Some paintings had to buy.
I think that any bad faith on the need to fight the promulgation of confirmed facts.

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

In any case, the presence of a receipt, check on purchase or any other document certifying the right to own, today we need

You are absolutely right.

[раскатов]

Regarding the check or receipt, it is already too seriously, because Many paintings were bought a long time and it is difficult to recall anyone. A random purchase at the collapse and flea markets, as in the past?