Go to fight some old

[Mark]

Сообщение от dedulya37

http://www.maslovka.ru/viewtopic.php?f=61&t=906

Scissors For some reason, can not write is taken from a document where published. Can I find out kaknitt?

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Mark

At Scissors for some reason can not write the document is taken from

To paraphrase, that "what do we read, for it and copied.
(Reread my first sentence in the message)

[izofond]

Сообщение от Mark

Scissors For some reason, can not write is taken from a document where published. Can I find out kaknitt?

Document taken from the authors of the letter (signed) and published on the website "Maslovka - a town of artists" - is not that enough ?!!!
Those who do not use the Internet can read the letter in the newspaper "Tomorrow" for May number 21 (same source).

Cyril:
1. "not much" is not applicable to debris (ie a definition of a. and-vu give authors of the letter). For them, the temple should not be "a little dirty." And the question will ultimately be put where in principle: why in the museum, which was formed with a definite eye on the art, invades something that is fundamentally antagonistic to this view? If you are an Orthodox Christian, you do not come into his head to go to pray in a mosque or synagogue? Is it not enough places where you can exhibit the "genius"? Or go bad? .. Need untwisted mark, to bask in the glory of the distinguished names? ... "Kohl and Vasya were here!".
2. Albert was interviewed on the channel "Culture", where he was apparently not by chance, was invited. Channel "Culture" patronized by the Ministry of Culture of Russia. Minister - the boss in the ministry, he and explain the aesthetic feature of excrement in the air.

Eugene: The letter was not written about who was "but for the sake of those who" come ", and I must say, concern in the letter was not accidental.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от izofond

For them, the temple should not be "a little dirty." And the question will ultimately be put where in principle: why in the museum, which was formed with a definite eye on the art, invades something that is fundamentally antagonistic to this view?

In the department of the twentieth century, the museum should be submitted to all the trends of domestic art.
Spectators vybirut themselves that they like and that there is "garbage."
P. Tretyakov bought pictures, "fresh" made here just now. And too often questionable for today.
Then somehow resulted in a sample comparison of the Cheka Malevich and "Girls, illuminated by the sun" (1888) by Valentin Serov.

Сообщение от Buscador

As for the children, then when I showed them reproductions, reaching the "Black Square", they asked me - and that is also a picture? I showed them "girl, lit by the sun" and asked "What do you prefer? You would not believe - v.Serov!

I recall that Pavel Tretyakov criticized for obtaining of this painting is the artists.
In 1889, Vladimir Makovsky at the next dinner Wanderers threw Pavel Mikhailovich Tretyakov defiant phrase: "Since when Pavel, you have to inculcate in your gallery syphilis?".
Was this phrase did not like?

[izofond]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

In the department of the twentieth century, the museum should be submitted to all the trends of domestic art.
Spectators vybirut themselves that they like and that there is "rubbish".

And who asked the audience something? As you see, asking only "geniuses", specialists in shit and pure, unblemished paint to canvas. Or you have noticed the endless line at the Museums "actual" art. The fact of the matter is that without massive, preferably outrageous, scandalous advertising these rotten foot, no one will want to sniff. And so - the higher the level dibilizma spectator, the offer large want to look at ass naked in the subway, or on the rusty batteries, instead of chandeliers hung example. in the Kremlin, etc. new art.
I agree that this kind of art - the art of shocking, but not art. And if so - nothing to do in the gallery of the same name.

In 1889, Vladimir Makovsky at the next dinner Wanderers threw Pavel Mikhailovich Tretyakov defiant phrase: "Since when Pavel, you have to inculcate in your gallery syphilis?".
Was this phrase did not like?

It reminds me of the simple truth: only the owner-collector of the right to determine thin. vision of their congregation. The current ideological exposition Tretyakov likened ignorant and as impudent apprentice who tries to write up something on a canvas of Rembrandt.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от izofond

can read the letter in the newspaper "Tomorrow" for May № 21

All clear-sheet, which has always supported the Communists and stalinistov.Kommentirovat no desire ..

[izofond]

We are afraid that it? ..

[Евгений]

Сообщение от izofond

We are afraid that it? ..

I just wrote: gebeshny writing style, something to fear?

[izofond]

Well illustrations with it, with style. And indeed, why do not want?

[Евгений]

izofond, In fact, such letters only undermine the credibility of the Soviet zhivopisi.Ya happy to collect and disseminate Soviet art during 1930 1960gg.S letter, written in a tone and content, strongly disagreed.