Degenerate Art? Art of degenerates!

[artcritic]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And the angel here.
Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519), "Angel in the flesh", 1513-1515, the black chalk or charcoal on blue paper,
268 × 197 mm. German private collection. At the Conservation Fund Pedretti, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Miniatures
Click image for larger version Name: Leonardo Da Vinci .. jpg Views: 13 Size: 182.6 KB ID: 247315

At first glance it seems that someone is dorisoval later .. do not you think?

[SAH]

Сообщение от artcritic

At first glance it seems that someone is dorisoval later .. do not you think?

There everything is in harmony, this drawing of Leonardo. And not only on the subject.

[ФЕОФАН МУХИН]

Сообщение от artcritic

At first glance it seems that someone is dorisoval later .. do not you think?

Angels are usually portrayed as a fair-haired androgynous (possessing characteristics of both sexes) of boys with wings (a symbol of freedom of the spirit) in a white linen dress with golden girdles.
- Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[artcritic]

Сообщение от Mukhin ФЕОФАН

The angels are usually portrayed as a fair-haired androgynous (possessing characteristics of both sexes) of boys with wings (a symbol of freedom of the spirit) in a white linen dress with golden girdles.
- Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And where that information is an angel, and not just youth? What osnovyvaetsya this conclusion?

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]
This is not a drawing by Leonardo, and some kind of sleaze, it would be seen once the master's hand, and then some inconsistencies. Roughly drawn