Degenerate Art? Art of degenerates!

[voloviks]

Сообщение от Yan

For many centuries the question of such exemption was not raised, painting and had to combine their direct responsibilities - the study of spatial relationships with color and indirect - the transfer of visual information. Artists breathe more freely, strangely enough, with the advent of photos - there were those who could now be responsible for the "image" and, moreover, the similarity.

True, and the exhibition "degenerate art" was the so-called art critics, theorized at the time, and the foundation was laid, the term name - Degeneration - reducing the level of organization in the process of evolution. And only something.
Probably badly named. And away, like the old joke "I'm sorry, fish - fish - pike, pike - bite, bite - a dog, the dog - female:" Men! "He had called me a bitch"
Well nothing, the roads in Russia, too, still no ....

[color="# 666686"]Added after 13 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Yan

Now, with regard to the pictures. I beg your pardon, in polemic fervor came lightly - again, you should answer, and not something to really want. But it seemed to me, many and misunderstood.
The first series - it is who "on the one hand" - artists who are only interested in painting itself, so to speak - vertical art.
"On the other hand - those who are more interested in the opportunity to become" the rulers of the minds ", or at least earn some money (preferably both) - that is, those who are on the external borders of art, its horizontal.

Umnitsa Yan, example:
The TV screen - a boy builds a terrible grimace
text - I, too, so I can, but why show it to the whole world?
answer - because we can.