I propose to discuss a law on the import and export

[Selene]

Сообщение от Eugene

Selene, but I'm interested in just the first part, as the norm in 20 years I think glupostyu.Ya honestly do not remember where this quote to take it, but if you find a link, well , I am not a lawyer, but as something more understandable like to convey my thoughts.

: D If the basis of the art dealer to take this approach, you can get rich. For example, the expert writes in the conclusion that the authorship of the work alleged to belong to the artist N. The word "allegedly" to the buyer can not communicate at all, unless, of course, the dealer is not interested.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Selene

If the basis of the art dealer to take this approach, you can get rich

I am interested in this issue 5 years, and not 20.Esli this rule change, a low bow to all lawyers and experts.
--------------------------------------------

[Selene]

Сообщение от Eugene

I am interested in this issue 5 years, and not 20.Esli this rule change, a low bow to all lawyers and experts.
--------------------------------------------

In this case, you should not talk about an apparent contradiction to the norms of the Civil Code and Law on Import-Export (obviously, you are misled by certain statements made during the discussion of the topic), and the commutation of the current legislation. Lawyers, let us leave the question of eliminating conflicts of law.
On a personal note: legislators are unlikely to reach the abolition of special (longer) periods of acquisitive prescription. They can reduce, but not much. In any case, reduction of these deadlines will not solve other, more urgent problems (for the owner of cultural property) required for the court to establish ownership.
By the way, thanks, that drew my attention to an article by Mr. Mazein. However, after I considered vyrvany from the context of a piece, I decided was that I was supposed to be retired (the idea is formulated clearly, competently, and it was hard to imagine that this author does not take into account the issue of special regulation). Today found the second part of the paragraph, and everything fell into place. at the same time became acquainted with the author's position on other issues, and recommend that everyone who is working on propihivaniem changes. Retire too early.: D

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Selene

who is working on propihivaniem changes.

Dear Selena, push through, no-push through, as they will tell (there at the top), and budet.My can only express pozhelaniya.No agree the law on import or export of cultural property (Russia), is an anachronism already 20 years ..
Okay, let's not far away from the topic.

[Selene]

Сообщение от OlgaV

What, however, an interesting discussion turned

We are not debating. Just Eugene quoted, which interested me. I decided once again to make sure whether I understand the problem. For hobbies and common development, so to speak. It turned out I did not no one believe that there is no apparent contradiction, there is legkoustranimy defect. And specifically looked in the literature found no references to the alleged contradiction.
By the way, Mr. Mazein, in my opinion, perfectly vlaeet object (such a conclusion I made the acquaintance of his articles), why would you not invite him to his company? http://www.ecsocman.edu.ru/db/msg/29...nt/291333.html
A criminal law, I would, frankly, in general, warning, here to disturb you. Once, not to the point it ...

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Selene

why would you not invite him to his company?

And how to do it would be great, professional, interesting to hear.

[Selene]

Сообщение от Eugene

And how?

In exile, which I have pointed out the soap. I, unfortunately, with this specialist is not familiar. But if, on behalf of the distinguished community to invite him to join, perhaps, Mr. Mazein not refuse.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]

Сообщение от OlgaV

About criminal law, I can only repeat: "In every joke, there is some joke.

: confused: What is the connection ...