Degenerate Art? Art of degenerates!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Veronic

And with what joy to the Biennale is going?

Would you like to go Arthur Braginsky? : D

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Veronic

Cyril, that's like me as you so naively put it, sometimes I think, seriously you are joking or if you please ?.....

Yes, naive ... : shy: But I do not know how to express it even easier to understand me? Can low? : eek: It will be closer, I think some of the participants ... : D: D: D

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

You would like to go Arthur Braginsky? : D

 
very funny, but if you go ,.... Cyril, then it slid to the theme?
 
Continue, for lovers of high .... Taken from the same article, about Chichkan
 
Lyudmila Bereznitsky, who wrote the documentation for the project Chichkan overate henbane and gave out completely insane verbal constructions:
"Porno" long no one is shocking, appearing in the pages of glossy magazines, and even more briefly browsed through lowbrow and not worried readers. It seems therefore as if the artist wanted to enliven our senses in relation to the sex act, and add her interpretation of the situation of loss of pornography industry of its "legitimate" places, and thus to focus our attention on sex, and as erotic feelings, and how to love. "
 
And then the journalists apparently mocked the words of art critic .... yes, yes, sometimes it happens, can you imagine? : D Actually, I can not imagine an art critic in this situation, it is absurd they looked ....
 
"All this, and the statements Bereznitsky that the project« Pornopop »shocking and provocative, of course, is nonsense and intellectual meningitis. Find beautiful concepts to projects Chichkan - this is a completely unfounded masturbation, for which, obviously, is hiding fear Chichkan submit art as it is, the desire to give him a kind of artistic polish, which is criminal and immoral when we are dealing with contemporary art. In «Pornopop» should not be anything but simple human bang, which was erected Chichkan in the form of a "muddy pop art" for the crowd, the audience of all ages. "It's just sex. It is an art as an economic and media-method. Type members. tit Type. That's all. No other underpinnings here. And it's good. There is an erection ? And it's good. "

[Семен Семенович]

Сообщение от Veronic

"Porno" long no one is shocking, appearing in the pages of glossy magazines, and even more briefly browsed through lowbrow and not worried readers. It seems therefore as if the artist wanted to enliven our senses in relation to the sex act and add their interpretation of the situation of loss of pornography industry of its "legitimate" places, and thus to focus our attention on sex, and as erotic feelings, and how to love. "

I do not understand, we're talking about art or porn! Or for some it is the same thing? As for Poyarkova - Pushkin is so-so poet, because he did not understand the west. And only that for him the main thing - do not understand in the west! Here, too, is not surprising, since Poyarkov can be read Pushkin in the school, but nothing to remember and could not. And this

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Semen Semenovich

I do not understand, we are talking about art or porn! Or for some it is the same thing?

It's not me writing, quotations are taken from the article. And the words of the distinguished Bereznitsky to art.
Yes for some art and porn is the same thing.