The first session of the Sotheby's Russian auction brought $ 10 million

[SAH]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I would like to intelligible arguments.

I do not think that anyone can clearly argue. It's not mathematical projections and from other more subtle matter. Probably will be expensive to pay for things of interest in all senses, so to speak with a bouquet of Advantages, and perhaps these things can be as academic as well as pictures of nonconformists. Depending on your preferences and tastes of the buyer.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

SAH, if we are talking about investments and about the money, we would like to hear any arguments, and not just promises of 2-3 years is something to see. No?

[SAH]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

SAH, when it comes to investments and in general about the money, we would like to hear any arguments, and not just promises of 2-3 years is something to see. No?

Well, what arguments? We are busy collecting and trading art. If you talk about me then I am inclined to buy so-called unofficial, paintings with meaning, I was not interested in grass and twigs. Eugene and Sergey prefer academic work, and many in the post-Soviet countries are prone to this type of art. My personal opinion is that perspiktiva for semantic proizvideniyami. What it is based? Sooner or later people will receive adequate education, or breadth of vision and are willing to pay and have not only Shishkin, Aivazovsky and pokayfovat from the other arts. But this is my opinion and I hope I did them no wrong.

[qwerty]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

SAH, if we are talking about investments and about the money, we would like to hear any arguments, and not just promises in 2-3 years something to see. No?

Arguments in favor of a bright future of an artist.

In order to invest in the artist is not in vain - have not much.

1. The artist must be distinctive, original-recognizable. This is important.
2. He must be industrious, the market should attend a sufficient number of works.
3. Must find the strength to promote the growth of popularity of the artist, organizes its exhibitions and publishes catalogs.

All this is from the sixties and completely absent in the socialist realists, in whom the main slogan was "Be like everyone else. What arguments need more?

[Meister]

Сообщение от SAH

My personal opinion is that perspiktiva for semantic proizvideniyami. What it is based? Sooner or later people will receive adequate education, or breadth of vision and are willing to pay and have not only Shishkin, Aivazovsky and pokayfovat from the other arts. But this is my opinion and I hope I did them no wrong.

if you could double to put "thank you", I would have necessarily done.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от qwerty

What are the arguments need more?

Personally, I-no.
Thank you.
Short and clear. : p

[SergeiSK]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I would like to hear any arguments

I would like to hear your arguments and personally. Was going, what kind of art prefer, what are the prospects of the art market.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

... painting" Meeting Franklin Delano Roosevelt with the Shah of Iran Mohammed Reza Pahlavi "brush Soviet Academician Alexander Gerasimov exceeded the upper estimate nearly doubled. Work has brought thousands of dollars with 74,5 preliminary estimate of 30-40 thousand. The result is unexpected: ARTinvestment.RU believed that if the painting and sell it at a price not exceeding the lower bound estimate. (c)

http://artinvestment.ru/news/auctnew...ssian_art.html
I think there still characters paintings influenced such care.

[Синица]

Somehow, nobody in the survey, nor in the discussion did not pay attention to the work of Alexander Volkov. In my opinion, a wonderful ... And the relatively low estimeyt ...

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Tit

For some reason, nobody in the survey, nor in the discussion did not pay attention to the work of Volkova

Nice work. A.Volkov-талантище ... The best that was in Uzbekistan.