Contemporary art of Ukraine (without revolution)

[gans]

Сообщение от Art-lover

To help in her focus, was a little paginal putevodstvo (which can be periodically replenished).

priceless work! It is necessary !!! Thank you!

[Jasmin]

[color="# 666686"]Added after 7 minutes[/color]
I prefer the approach Semen Semenovich, which is written honestly, I do not close. [/QUOTE]

Art - is not only a craft, and not so much a craft ... a lot of Craftsmen, and the creators of little ... artist - a creator of his world, though not perfect, but his own. Who does not understand, he does not understand anything in the arts. The thin line between the creator of the highly professional craftsman. You can learn the technique, but the art is not relevant.

[Yaya]

Art-lover, thanks. interesting. way, Friday was the opening of the exhibition Bludova (№ 5 in your list). Pts. like

[Феликс]

Сообщение от gans

You mean a performance, or that a communicative art?

Performance is not the direction and type, such as painting. I mean zavyazany for multimedia another conceptual-ism, like Impressionism, Cubism, Fauvism ... In the posture-year before the Venice Biennale, for example, this type of art as "oil on canvas" was only in Belarus, and Libya. But the "isms" have come and gone, but art remains.
Personally, my opinion: the novelty is one of the main principles of art, especially the present. Many now write better than Van Gogh, but what this will be the price? But at the same time (my opinion) - when to something casteth a label with "ism", it immediately utrachivat relevance and becomes a fragment of history. This is in art in general can not be klasifitsirovano. Which of the "isms" you react Titian, Holbein, or?

[Семен Семенович]

Сообщение от Jasmin

artist - a creator of his world, though not perfect, but his own. Who does not understand, he does not understand anything in the art.

And not far from here and to sectarianism! We have a lot of people creating their own world and live in it. But what are they artists? In my opinion, the artist must have a certain amount of strong knowledge and skills in their profkssii. And work, work, work ... And to create something of their own - do not understand (and who among us, in your opinion, has created something of their own?). See your world through the canvas and paint - just not enough to be called an artist. Artist - is a profession (and it is the knowledge and skills), which requires daily work (handicraft), it is spirituality, which requires daily work (inner peace) ... This ability to move from contemplation to creation, based on high professionalism ...

[color="# 666686"]Posted 35 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Art-lover

Perhaps, the relevance can be established until it is not recognized as valid. After the identification of "relevant" immediately begins to clone a simulacrum of actual, ie operate exclusively in the arts as a business project.

"Contemporary Art" - art for today. Tomorrow it is no use to anyone, because tomorrow is actually another. And art - forever.
Velazquez, Rembrandt, Renoir and Serov ... Shakespeare, Aldridge, Pushkin and Chekhov ... Bach, Beethoven, Strauss and Tchaikovsky ... Stanislavsky and M. Chekhov, Eisenstein ........
This art - forever! It is always well-to-t-u-a-l-b-n-oh!

[gans]

Сообщение от Jasmin

Maybe in time (if it is art will exist), inventing a chip kotoryi be inserted into the brain, and immediately before the individual opens the beauty and depth of philosophical ideas and theories the authors of a particular product .. . everything will be different "breadth of mind" and, accordingly, good taste.

I understand your message that you do not accept the "conceptual" art.
  And now you say

[color="# 666686"]Added a 51 seconds[/color]

Сообщение от Jasmin

You can learn the technique, but the art is not relevant.

[Jasmin]

I "conceptual art" is not close, shall we say ... it does not affect any of my strings - sometimes causes or smile, or irritable, and I immediately forgot how "it" look, I do not remember a single subject "of the art "except the skull Hirst because of the number of diamonds, and this irritated - so much about the poor and hungry ...

[color="# 666686"]Posted 6 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Semen Semenovich

And not far from here and to sectarianism! We have a lot of people creating their own world and live in it. But what are they artists? In my opinion, the artist must have a certain amount of strong knowledge and skills in their profkssii. And work, work, work ... And to create something of their own - do not understand (and who among us, in your opinion, has created something of their own?). See your world through the canvas and paint - just not enough to be called an artist. Artist - is a profession (and it is the knowledge and skills), which requires daily work (handicraft), it is spirituality, which requires daily work (inner peace) ... This ability to move from contemplation to creation, based on professionalism ...

No one denies the professionalism, skill ... But Salieri was also a master of his craft, but Mozart was a genius ... To create works of art are required, plus crafts to qualities such as talent, internal demand and inspiration ...

[SAH]

Сообщение от Yaya

By the way, Friday was the opening of the exhibition Bludova (№ 5 in your list). Pts. liked

And where it goes?

Сообщение от Jasmin

and this has caused irritation - so many poor and hungry around ...

Poverty is no crime, but let me say that any art, paying people not starving.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от SAH

let me say that any art, paying people not starving.

You can go to exhibitions, museums. It is not expensive.

[gans]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

You can go to exhibitions, museums. It is not expensive.

Yes, but what in museums, where something had been done despite the "poor and hungry."