Old paintings on the attribution of

[alen]

[QUOTE=alexander7566;3320751]One can not understand-what is it You want us to hear?In painting,as I understood You are not a novice,the picture You have on hand and to explore it much easier than us-bad photo.If the first picture of the pre-revolutionary period ,it is quite good:the story of the sea,the size,the type level(Kapustin,Cascandy,Shevtsova),and the signature of the possible native there.Left to bring it in saleable condition,it is desirable to arrange in an old gilt frame and sell for good money.P.S. It is not excluded that the picture eventually "POPs"on one of the auctions,with signature confirmation stated on kartini@

Thank You for your kind advice, but in painting, I is not very good, and only thanks to this site, and with good experts I am just learning to understand. Some original paintings for myself, I acquired after sincere opinions of our esteemed experts here that are always grateful. Copies I do not leave, if the original will leave for himself happy( Artinvest ). Although sales in the second plan, and even if you sell it it is necessary to present a fair picture, saying It is a copy or original of N. A. Sergeeva or N. To.Sergeeva, so I want from you sincere help. On account of the levels of expressed only You, comparing the level Kapustin,Konstandi,Shevtsova. Well it would be more sincere opinions and other Santoku. With respect.