Please help with the attribution of a painting

[олег назаров]

Originally Posted by nefilim

unfortunately, this stuff is not Warhol

This is not daub! strong very good artist made.

[nefilim]

[QUOTE=олег назаров;3312091]This is not daub! strong very good artist sdelannaja@
I'm talking about your taste say...It haunted me all my childhood and never liked it
The question of how the artist. Who is this? Glushchenko N. or not?

Added after 27 seconds

Originally Posted by Кирилл Сызранский

Evenly during the day on her head.

Lavra Zadornov not give rest?

Added after 49 seconds

Originally Posted by redbor

RUB a cotton swab in the area. Watercolor, gouache, ink - rasplyvetsya. On inks will not affect

Thank you. I'll try in the evening. The outcome will write

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by nefilim

laurels Zadornov haunt?

Yeah, especially when someone gives such wise advice.
On the photos you can see everything, but You can RUB a cotton swab, not a question.

[nefilim]

[QUOTE=Кирилл Сызранский;3312131]yeah, especially when someone gives such wise advice.
On the photos you can see everything, but You can RUB a cotton swab, not vopros@

Rubs a bit...sorry for what? Tap water until there is Light... the truth off more often, so you can not see the result But the water, in any case, the cold, there constantly.

[Балагур]

Originally Posted by nefilim

Dear Lord, help in authentication of authorship and the assessment of the picture. Supposedly it Glushchenko, but I doubt
Thanks

Interesting work! Seems like a graphics editor allocated tints, transitions. Very nice.

[nefilim]

According to the results of experience are authorized to announce: after friction wet cotton swab , something significant to mine failed...the Wool is a little dirty with paint, but very slightly, despite the persistence of the experimenter.
Thank you all for your participation and valuable advice (even ironic)
However, the question of authorship remains. Not whether some thoughts looking at the signature? Or can advise who to contact? Without knowledge of the authorship of the value indefinable, I guess.

Added after 1 minutes
[QUOTE=Балагур;3312891]Interesting work! Seems like a graphics editor allocated tints, transitions. Very priyatno@
When she was done, words such as "graphic editor" nobody knew...She 45-50 years not less than....

[Балагур]

[QUOTE=nefilim;3312901]According to the results of experience are authorized to announce: after friction wet cotton swab , something significant to mine failed...the Wool is a little dirty with paint, but very slightly, despite the persistence of the experimenter.
Thank you all for your participation and valuable advice (even ironic)
However, the question of authorship remains. Not whether some thoughts looking at the signature? Or can advise who to contact? Without knowledge of the authorship of the value indefinable, I guess.

Added after 1 minute

When she was done, words such as "graphic editor" nobody knew...She 45-50 years old not menee@
All right! Done so masterfully, as I write: "it Seems like in the graphical editor"

[nefilim]

Originally Posted by Балагур

All right! Done so masterfully, as I write: "it Seems like in the graphical editor"

Here I should like to know who is this great , but indefinite master. How to determine the name of the author?
But to me she still doesn't like it

[redbor]

Originally Posted by nefilim

Vata little dirty paint, but very slightly, despite the persistence of the experimenter.

Watercolor or gouache, which usually write on paper, water washed. What is not written in oil and acrylic - this is obvious. Most likely paint printing

[nefilim]

Originally Posted by redbor

Watercolor or gouache, which usually write on paper, water washed. What is not written in oil and acrylic - this is obvious. Most likely paint typographical

Can roll the swab through the stencil...But it's not something I'm interested... Here's authorship interesting. From authorship depends, what to do with it..that is its value. Who would of Ukrainian authors could be?