"Artist's shit" from the Tar Catherine

[nikola]

Away from me, German. I prepared the chicken broth, noodles asleep. All he liked, but he ate well, soup spoon, and noodles to fish with a fork.
Resented by modern art, it certainly can, but we must bear in mind that the "iron curtain" was opened several years ago.
In the dictionary of foreign words of the late 60th edition of years, impressionism is defined as the direction of bourgeois art is not acceptable for the builders of communism. I'm not talking about the attitude of the authorities for more radical directions.
So what he says Tar, can be understood only if you know how it all evolved.
We have a forum running formal painting does not cause the burst of positive emotions, even if the artist is almost a genius (Nicolas de Stael). A leap in the consciousness of the era, it is not realistic.
I am not a supporter of current. I need spiritual support and moral reasoning in the usual me-traditional, plastic art. It's harmonically complete, whole world to himself. And to me it lacks, and air and light.
And what happens now, is not necessarily love. It just need to know. I assure you. The artists themselves, providing relevant, in the most charming and educated people.

And for Tar questions were below the belt, on the brink of a foul. Consequently, so are the answers.