"Artist's shit" from the Tar Catherine
 

Almost straight from the tin intellectual product of Katherina Tar, an art critic, curator, chief-editor section of art portal OpenSpace.ru.

• The traditional left in the past, those who practiced today, involved a kind of fishing. There is still Palekh boxes and Khokhloma - so that's "modern traditional art" as you put it in the same status.

• "Artist's shit" is a work of art, not the artist's shit, because it invested considerable intellectual force of the author and the hundreds of art historians and philosophers who have written about this and write.

• Art is no longer connected with the idea of beauty.

• The criterion of success of the artist - this is (apart from talent, which no one has repealed) of his consciousness. He must understand that doing and be able to explain it. In this he differs radically from the artist's past, which were supposed to "moo with delight, and silent

• Vasnetsov and Aivazovsky painted very badly, I tell you as a professional art historian and expert on the art of 19 century. And even then people said: compare modern daub with the work of Titian.

• Painting once was (before the Renaissance) and there and now as a separate art form.

• Art - this is not some kind of title (something that is better than no art). Art - this is such a professional field. This is something that is exhibited in museums and galleries.

They were all quotes. Completely read the press conference materials can be reached at: http://lenta.ru/conf/degot/

I liked that: The issue of investments - an issue that will go down in history of art and what is not, judge for yourself about this, I do not give free advice on investments. (c)

dedulya37, not my quote ... : D

And that, right.

Never thought she was smart. But so ...! No, she was unwell! Vasnetsov could not draw! Well one must! Yes, it just d.. Well! I'm shocked! About such people, eye to e. .. w: D

[color="# 666686"]Posted 10 minutes[/color]
No, you just think, "painted very badly." To give!!!: D

What now has to read about Catherine's shit?

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]
Cyril, sorry, wrong button pressed. Of course, I would like to respond to the previous message.

dedulya37 here still and I thought, seeing the link, and then I saw your message!:)

  Better not say! Ah yes, Katerina! Here, fellow! It turns out that's different than the "artist's shit" from the artist's shit! Work of hundreds, such as tar, and the incredible "intelligent" power of the artist. So, my friends ...: D

And is it possible to compare the current scribble with the works of the same Aivazovsky and Vasnetsov?
It contradicts itself.
And she does not want to advertise their shit? And sell it as an art shit.

That's how it is already does it.