"Artist's shit" from the Tar Catherine

[Art-lover]

Not speaking here in defense of modern art, would, however, defend the principle of fair quoting.

Hi, Catherine!
Last time, seeing another "contemporary art" arises gag reflex. I understand that art is subjective, but all have the same limit. You look at any installation and think, why dormant punitive psychiatry.
Now the question is: Do not you think it's time to somehow separate the art from the freedom of expression? And then I, as a taxpayer has paid this "heppining" extremely indignant when I see in museums and exhibitions all nonsense.
PS Once heard one "artist" rolled up his feces in canning jars. Do you consider it art?

Answer:
In general, contemporary art, as well as an academic discipline - a complex area that requires education, and I would not advise him to judge those who, even with the Russian language there are certain problems. In addition, the fact that exhibited in galleries (and, say, a premium Kandinsky), you as the taxpayer does not pay as well as private enterprises. Gallery - this is generally a private shop, and it is intended, strictly speaking, only for those who want there to buy something.

Regarding the last question: Yes, the work of Piero Manzoni, Artist's shit "at the Art Museum and, therefore, is an art, not art, since that word - is not praise, but simply a statement of fact, to what type of things, this thing is (to works of art, rather than canned or not to souvenirs, for example). "Artist's shit" is a work of art, not the artist's shit, because it invested considerable intellectual force of the author and those of hundreds of art historians and philosophers who have written about this and write. Do not read this, understand this work (as well as contemporary art in general) is impossible.

Agree that the full context of meaning other than in a curtailed.