St. Petersburg artists sue Sergei Bugaev (Afrika)

[Ирина Ивановна]

Originally TEII had no workshops, no showrooms. But , having registered legally as an organization , the artists - members of the Association an opportunity , not a member of the Artists Union , publicly exhibit his works at the sites available for free from time to time by the city , such as the Palais des Festivals during the youth. But mostly exposed to the so -called spring and autumn exhibitions organized by TEII in different houses of culture . A lot of people came , the crowd , paying for tickets , the event paid off due to very high interest in the usual inexperienced spectator to unofficial art , such that they have never seen , not used to. As for the workshop , then someone from the artists had their own , and most by squatters settle in settled homes designed for overhaul . Between the eviction of residents and the actual start of repair had a few months to half a year, when malfunctioning, but still working and heating, and plumbing. And painted pictures . They tried to settle compactly . There's also staged a joint exhibition halls . For me, the most famous places is the " Bass /Treble " on the street . Tchaikovsky and st. Kalyaeva and the house on Pushkin 10 .

[олег назаров]

In order to populate a squat ( squatter shop ) had to be a cover here and artists and has helped TEII AZ .. It was not a pure squatting , usually the whole procedure soprovovozhdalas TEII or letters from A to Z in various organizations ( executive committee, the housing office i.t.dr ) .
As long as the artist had at least some paper with a stamp of his not so easy to move out at the time. <! - ~ 1 ~ -> himself in those years nednokratno passed through it.

[bykinist]

Сообщение от Irina

came from Novorossiysk

Inal Andrew Savchenko and Krisanov too by the way came from Novorossiysk , Vadim Ovchinnikov from Pavlodar Gutsevich Fastova of the Ukraine , etc. What I mean is that, in this case, your Leningrad egocentrism is not quite appropriate .

Сообщение от Irina

According to his classmates at school Novorossiysk tyril their model typewriters

Milo . ) ) ( This "fact " will be invaluable in the lawsuit. )

Сообщение от Irina

And to call a unique self- respected artists ... disrespectful "hangouts" can only afford a Muscovite .

Muscovite, who has made an exhibition of these artists at the gallery in Moscow, has a considerable number of works by these artists in the collection , and otherwise contribute to their advancement in the art market .

Сообщение от Irina

Actually New Artists - this is one of the sections of the Leningrad TEII Association of Experimental art , along with a section or a section Mitki nekrorealistov .

Thank you, I have discovered America.

But instead of exercises in avtofilii , along with honoring partisan /demonization chego-to/kogo-to , I think will be more useful to try to " discover " the essence of the question , in fact, understand who these new artists, what their genesis , the promise , and so etc. this will help us to authoritative critic, a serious man and a great specialist and historian of the Leningrad underground - Love Y. Gurevich . The article is called " LOHOTRON ."

[annagavr]

Сообщение от bykinist

This will help us to authoritative critic, a serious man and a great specialist and historian of the Leningrad underground - Love Y. Gurevich.
The article is called "LOHOTRON."

Usable article.
It has been published somewhere?

[bykinist]

Сообщение от annagavr

Usable article . It has been published somewhere ?

This article I first read about five years ago in a small samoizdatskom bukletikov scanty printed edition. Perhaps this article is the same as in Love Gurevich . Painters of the Leningrad underground ( St. Petersburg: The Art of St. Petersburg , 2007 ), but the hand is not the book that would look.

[Ирина Ивановна]

Сообщение от bykinist

Inal Andrew Savchenko and Krisanov too by the way came from Novorossiysk , Vadim Ovchinnikov from Pavlodar Gutsevich Fastova of the Ukraine , etc.

I will answer your own quote : "Thank you , I have discovered America. "

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 2 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от bykinist

What I mean is that, in this case, your Leningrad egocentrism is not quite appropriate .

Sorry, but you got me wrong . The emphasis is not accounted for within the meaning of the word "Novorossiysk " and the word " Muscovite " . Moscow artpublika traditionally decades has positioned itself as the only significance of having a national scale, relegating Petersburg artists to ' party ', meaningful, in their view, only the scale of their hometown. Do not even hesitate at the opening of the exhibition " New Artists" in the MMSI and said in a live broadcast. Zastolblenny defending their meager domestic artmarket from competitors.

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 6 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от bykinist

Muscovite, who has made an exhibition of these artists at the gallery in Moscow, has a considerable number of works by these artists in the collection , and otherwise contribute to their advancement in the art market .
[/media]

Maybe you have a lot of work these artists do not , namely Africa , so you fight for his reputation to save their investments from the fall in price.
"New Artists" group as a whole , not as individual authors , or a select few of them , only promoted the Russian Museum in the face Ekaterina Andreeva and Moscow MMSI last year, and then the last in the catalog for some incredible number of names submitted. Every year the number of participants is growing by leaps and bounds. A list of participants before their joint exhibitions and ten names were not always achieved .

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 13 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от bykinist

But instead of exercises in avtofilii , along with honoring partisan /demonization chego-to/kogo-to , I think will be more useful to try to " discover " the essence of the question , in fact, understand who these new artists, what their genesis , the promise , and so etc. this will help us to authoritative critic, a serious man and a great specialist and historian of the Leningrad underground - Love Y. Gurevich . The article is called " LOHOTRON ."

The proposal is very relevant, it is desirable to implement open a new topic , because it is very volume , and , in addition, still being discussed here precedent copyright protection in the courts.

[bykinist]

Сообщение от Irina

Moscow artpublika traditionally decades has positioned itself as the only significance of having a national scale, relegating Petersburg artists to ' party ', meaningful, in their view, only the scale of their hometown. Do not even hesitate at the opening of the exhibition " New Artists" in the MMSI and said in a live broadcast. Zastolblenny defending their meager domestic artmarket from the competition .

I sincerely sympathize with you of course , but it is complex . Imagine what must I do to be complex , given that the authorities in Moscow, St. Petersburg . )))

Сообщение от Irina

Maybe you have a lot of work these artists do not , namely Africa , so you fight for his reputation to save their investments from the fall in price.

Just the same, Africa is not interesting to me as an artist.

And what is it that you have placed about the " new" in Mexico?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от bykinist

in Moscow, St. Petersburg authorities.

In Moscow, the authorities crooks, thieves and bandits.

[олег назаров]

I saw in the network ...

[Ирина Ивановна]

Сообщение от bykinist

And what is it that you have placed about the " new" in Mexico ?

Love Gurevich written article undoubtedly useful and talented , but extremely vicious . The main point of the article: Timur Novikov had the audacity to be successful and get the money , not even being an artist and art historian without education by total falsification of art.
  Sure, Timur Novikov did not deserve to imagine such a relationship. As to the period of his creative activity, when he was a member of the "New Artists ", and the lead , I specifically cited the example above of the exhibition catalog , 1991 in Mexico City Museum of Contemporary Art. And a real exhibition , which took place in reality , not on paper, and the directory is not adulterated , circulation 2,000 copies in all - still can be verified. And the list of members is clearly not organized alphabetically , proves that Novikov do not always know how to " exploit the situation for their own purposes and " feel the demiurge , " there were more nimble counterparts - the catalog opens first S. Bugaev .

  As for the apparent falsification of documents submitted to various directories on the HX , these falsifications not just lie on the surface and catch the eye of any careful reader of these directories , and not just " Pageturner ." They are many , here are just two examples. In the catalog of the Russian Museum " Brushstroke " in 2010 on page 300 in the list of exhibitions, which took HX, it says: "New Artists" in 1983 Kuzneckiy 17 Moscow . Of course , not all Muscovites do not know at this address if there is a historical building of the former monastery of Tver , but all a bit familiar with the history of NC is well known that the first NH exhibited in Moscow House of Artists in the Kuznetsk bridge , 11 only in 1986 youth on the 17th exhibition , being invited back through the exhibition TEII at which they actually noticed. That is so blatantly distorted the years from 1986 to 1983 . But not Novikov in 2010 influenced the drafters of this directory. Another example , if one takes the trouble to look into the documents are not readable in the exhibition catalog scandalous "Assa . The latest generation of the Leningrad avant-garde " , then they can be seen without a magnifying glass as famously in the dates of the hand of the figures forwarded years so that the latter was the number 2 . I even found one among them , which have not yet managed to smuggle , appears creation date of 1984 , although the name of the group is clearly reprinted again, because earlier in 1984 they called themselves The new painters, and sometimes Engineers and the New Art . Status is New Artists took shape only in 1986 so that by the falsification of documents and " create labels " is still unknown who made and continues to put a hand , at least , is not exactly one Timur Petrovich , but apparently some special interest in the substitution of a member of dates former NH group and \\\\ or collectors and art historians serving them .