Art as a commodity: Paradoxes and patterns

[Коллекционер-любитель]

Сообщение от Grigory; 2743041 "

the vast majority of participants in the art market Kotler , so to speak , does not know . That is , the art market - there are (members exist , the transactions occur, the money spinning ) . But marketing understanding of the art market , in my opinion , most of the participants so far .

iosif, thank you for the very informative message that illuminates from within our existing artbiznes . The main disadvantage of the Russian business - illiterate " prodvizhentsy " who do not know actually promoted product , they want a big profit in a short period of time. Hence, the situation of some locks and nouveau riche pictures with gilt frames.

Сообщение от Pavel; 2743281 "

Foreign experience you have studied ? There's a market just is, and here it just is not .

And this statement is completely illiterate - Russian mentality does not allow the use and repeated foreign experience .

Added after 10 minutes

Сообщение от Buscador; 2743621 "

Well, I do not need That's a painting of Ivan Ivanovich and test the possibilities of the time of writing ...

That's where you 're wrong . Read the recognition of Petrov. He gave about 200 attributions to Shishkin , Kiseleva , Orlovsky , Beggrova , hierarchy, Bronnikova , Kamenev and other famous Russian artists just because they were written at the same time , used the same materials ( canvas , paints , etc . ) , studied with the same teachers.