Irina Antonova was stepping down as director of the Pushkin Museum. Pushkin

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Konstantin; 2658801 "

And what is better? Stolen Fund (paintings ) , plundered the budget? Paintings throw ( stolen ) and the walls have deposited under the brothel , sorry office ?

When Lochak not be stolen , and for some bureaucrat would also not razvorovli it funds, but all, and we have to work in a museum - the walls with paintings on them is not a museum.

Сообщение от Konstantin; 2658801 "

But at the same time to see a living example that Loshak achieved in the field arena ?

You call the arena full range of museum- vystavochnogoobedineniya "Capital "? In this combination a few sites .

[Glasha]

Сообщение от ama; 2657761 "

Once here , these words inspire some concerns : " ... a new impetus and fresh breath ... "
God forbid we live in interesting times !

Сообщение от Seriy; 2657991 "

The horror .... It's just that the culture minister sacked by Picasso .

Ladies and gentlemen , I do not understand these lamentations ...
'91 ! ( I'm sorry )
And you thought this - ever? Eternity exists?
And Irina Antonova, she chose as her successor Marina mule, and this choice - worthy .

sorry, as at the death of Brezhnev - Universal flustered , what will happen? .. and then can only be worse ! ..
Why - is worse ?
The plan shows just will not be worse .

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от Glasha; 2658881 "

And you thought this - ever? Eternity exists ?

No, but at the same Antonov looked at least where , God forbid her health.
It is clear that the decision is related to any age or health ( well, maybe we do not all know of course). On the nomination , according to rumors (I say rumored ), the procedure was as follows - Antonova offered a choice of three options in receivers , two of which were previously not acceptable, as it were a choice without a choice. Very much in the spirit of recent times, by the way . A rapid-fire , allegedly linked all the same , with the scandal . But this is all speculation and I version of the " scandal" does not seem basic, more like causes always piling up and this is one of them, but the main thing is money. But what are they ? Well, obviously in the real estate or construction. Let's wait for large-scale projects ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Konstantin; 2658931 "

A hasty allegedly linked all the same , with the scandal . But this is all speculation and I version of the " scandal" does not seem basic, more like causes always piling up and this is one of them, but the main thing is money.

Version of the " scandal" I, too, does not see the reason , but that's the reason - is possible.
Remember: Antonova proposed to raise this issue at a meeting with Putin in the Kremlin that is , as a wave of criticism of the proposal is not replicated on the internet and in state-controlled media.

[ama]

Сообщение от Glasha

Ladies and gentlemen , I do not understand these " horrors" and laments ...
'91 ! ( I'm sorry )
And you thought this - ever? Eternity exists?
And Irina Antonova, she chose as her successor Marina mule, and this choice - worthy .

sorry, as at the death of Brezhnev - Universal flustered , what will happen? .. and then can only be worse ! ....
Why - is worse ?
The plan shows just will not be worse .

Wait and see . Unfortunately, lately , what's going on with our culture under the leadership of Medinskaya - only in the negative . Playpens both gave Lochak , where she was immediately closed the traditional Hudgraf and ArtMoscow . " Out of date " painting as well kick was given. Kapok gallery owners wrote a letter to the mule, and he did the same and pulled Lochak for review. It's ugly out ... Exhibition sites for conventional artists almost gone , everywhere primarily promote relevant . How would this " breath of fresh air " did not reach the Pushkin .... His breath, and Antonova enough (remember the underwear Marilyn Monroe )

[Кирилл Сызранский]

ama, you remember where we started this conversation .
You are in doubt naznachacheniya director of the Pushkin Museum. Pushkin Loshak and argues its decision not to grant Arena Gudgraf commercial fairs and Art Moscow . <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

Сообщение от ama; 2659071 "

Unfortunately, lately , what's going on with our culture under the leadership of Medinskaya - only in the negative . Playpens both gave Lochak , where she was immediately closed the traditional Hudgraf and ArtMoscow .

Itself - is not that funny ? <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

And again, the decision to appoint as head of the museum receives no minister of culture, of course.

[Тихая Сапа]

An example of a rare consensus : despite the direct participants of the process ( Antonova and mules ) ABSOLUTELY NO ONE ( or the internet or in real life ) does not believe that the Antonov left itself and that the appointment was Lochak Antonovskaya initiative.

Oddities permutations are quite obvious .

We paranoia and we are all looking for a conspiracy? Or actually a conspiracy, but why and how justified the secrecy in this case? The habit of imposing shadow on the fence ? As Beaumarchais wrote about politics , " pretend you do not know what is known to all , and what do you know something that no one knows , pretend that you hear something that nobody knew , and did not listen to what you can hear everything."

I'd rather paranoid ... otherwise it is somehow bad smell .

Although about Lochak cherish sincere (perhaps ill-founded ) hope

[Магнолия]

Сообщение от Silent Sapa

Oddities permutations are quite obvious.

Usually permutations are made through an intermediary, that the shadow of the past does not fall on the head of the future.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от ama; 2659071 "

exhibition sites for conventional artists almost no

For what it is " ordinary artists "?

Сообщение от ama; 2659071 "

everywhere primarily promote relevant .

Where is the " move the current "? I see that you wrote "all"? Where , please specify .
If you mean the private galleries , the exhibit there that close and interesting by gallery owners .
No one, as I understand it , does not prevent rent space at the exhibition and sale of works of all artists.
You can shoot footage in the Central House of Artists.
I see here on the forum, there are now Insert here the author. This " ordinary artist "?
Or you about some other shows ? That was supposed to do Loshak in his museum and exhibition association " Capital "?

[ama]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

For what it is " ordinary artists "?

Where is the " move the current "? I see that you wrote "all"? Where , please specify .
If you mean the private galleries , the exhibit there that close and interesting by gallery owners .
No one, as I understand it , does not prevent rent space at the exhibition and sale of works of all artists.
You can shoot footage in the Central House of Artists.
I see here on the forum, there are now Insert here the author. This " ordinary artist "?
Or you about some other shows ? That was supposed to do Loshak in his museum and exhibition association " Capital "?

Large areas, where 2 times a year gallery owners ( ArtMoska and Hudgraf ) , is no more. Who ends up in the CHA Show " graphic experiments " , an attempt to recreate the " Hudgraf " in a new place . The exhibition was a good , let's see - take hold or not. And just to shoot footage in the Central House of Artists - bad job , many have gone through this and do not want to .